Skip to main content
Tags: insulin | democrats
OPINION

Insulin Prices Fall, Democrats Respond With Denial

a row of vials of insulin
(Dreamstime)

Sally Pipes By Friday, 31 May 2024 08:42 AM EDT Current | Bio | Archive

For years, the left's campaign to dictate the price of prescription drugs has focused on one medicine above all others — insulin.

The hormone was discovered more than a century ago by Canadian doctor Frederick Banting and his medical student Charles Best. They famously sold their patent to the University of Toronto for $1 apiece. How can insulin still be a financial burden for some of the people with diabetes who need it?

This problem motivated the $35 insulin price cap for Medicare enrollees, which was put in place by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. It's why, back in 2019, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., took a caravan of people with him to Canada to purchase price-controlled insulin north of the border.

And it's the reason California Gov. Gavin Newsom remains intent on establishing a state-run insulin manufacturing operation called CalRx in partnership with generic manufacturer Civica Rx. A plant is being built in Virginia, and another is planned for California.

He had promised that the medication would be available to Golden Staters later this year at no more than $30 a vial. But it's unlikely that he'll meet that timeline.

And yet, a funny thing has happened on the long march to insulin price controls. The market corrected itself. Insulin prices have fallen on their own. And Democrats appear unaware.

The latest sustainability report from the pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly reveals that the list price for its popular Humalog insulin has plummeted in recent years from $275 a vial in 2018 to just $66 in 2023.

The net price — that is, what people pay after rebates and discounts — is down to $26 a vial. The company's biosimilar insulin, known as Lispro, is even more affordable, with a net price of $17. The report also notes that the average monthly out-of-pocket cost for Lilly-manufactured insulin has dropped from $38.64 to $17.16 over the last six years.

Recognizing that this market development would neutralize one of their signature issues this campaign season, Democrats have chosen not to notice. Even now, President Joe Biden seems to mention insulin prices on a near-daily basis as he makes his case for reelection.

Speaking at a campaign event in Reno, Nevada, this past March, for instance, he asked the audience, "How many of you know someone who needs ... insulin? OK well, guess what? It was costing four — 400 bucks a month on average. It now costs $35 a month."

During his remarks to the National Governors Association that same month, he went even further, saying, "We capped insulin for seniors on Medicare at $35 a month instead of as much as $400 a month. Well, let’s make that $35 available to everyone in your states — everyone."

It's empty rhetoric. As the Lilly report indicates, the private sector has already made insulin available for less than that figure.

Democrats have gotten good press for their $35 a month insulin price cap. But it's not clear whether it was ever necessary.

According to a report from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Medicare enrollees weren't paying $400 a month for insulin before Biden arrived on the scene. They were paying about $450 a year — $2.50 a month more than the new cap. And this was back in 2019, before the recent drop in net prices.

Even if out-of-pocket insulin costs were much higher than they are now, price controls wouldn't be the answer.

Drug companies have very little say over what Americans actually pay at the pharmacy counter. It's insurers and the middlemen organizations known as pharmacy benefit managers who have the most control over patients' cost-sharing obligations.

If lawmakers want to crack down on dishonest and exploitative prescription drug pricing practices, they could start by reining in PBMs.

In the meantime, imposing another round of price controls — or spending taxpayer dollars to get into the drug manufacturing business, as Gov. Newsom would like to do — isn't just a solution in search of a problem. It's a problem all its own.

In the end, such draconian interventions will only distort a domestic market for insulin that, at least right now, appears to be working just fine.

Sally C. Pipes is president, CEO, and the Thomas W. Smith fellow in healthcare policy at the Pacific Research Institute. Her latest book is "False Premise, False Promise: The Disastrous Reality of Medicare for All," (Encounter Books 2020). Follow her on Twitter @sallypipes. Read Sally Pipes' Reports — More Here.

© 2024 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


SallyPipes
Even if out-of-pocket insulin costs were much higher than they are now, price controls wouldn't be the answer.
insulin, democrats
744
2024-42-31
Friday, 31 May 2024 08:42 AM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.
Join the Newsmax Community
Read and Post Comments
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
 
TOP

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the NewsmaxTV App
Get the NewsmaxTV App for iOS Get the NewsmaxTV App for Android Scan QR code to get the NewsmaxTV App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved