John Hinderaker has been writing at PowerLine about the economic catastrophe taking place in Sri Lanka. Until very recently, that country was "not only food-secure, but a major agricultural exporter" of products like rice, tea and rubber.
One would think that creating prosperity and lifting millions out of poverty would be welcomed by government and social activists. But no. The government of Sri Lanka decided to mandate new policies prompted not by the recommendations of anyone with experience in industry, commerce or basic economics but by the howling of environmentalists demanding "all organic" farming.
Despite the fact that more than 75 percent of Sri Lanka's farmers used synthetic fertilizer, the Sri Lankan government banned it outright.
The results were predictable. In one year, Sri Lanka's rice production dropped by 14 percent, forcing the country to spend hundreds of millions importing a product they had formerly made enough of to feed themselves and export.
Production of tea and rubber similarly collapsed. The price of food has quadrupled, and many staples, including liquid petroleum gas that Sri Lankans use for cooking, are in such short supply that citizens must stand in line for them, when they can get them at all.
With its exports reduced to a trickle, Sri Lanka's government is now begging the International Monetary Fund for a loan it seems unlikely to get — or be able to pay back.
If this pattern seems vaguely familiar, it should. Many of us are old enough to have witnessed the fall of the former Soviet Union, brought to its knees by failed collectivism.
Younger folks have watched in real time as the economy of Venezuela, once the most prosperous country in South America, collapsed following implementation of top-down, command-and-control economic policies driven by socialist gobbledygook.
Inflation hit 1 million percent there in 2018. Venezuelan currency — the bolivar — is worthless. Almost 80 percent of the country now lives in "extreme poverty."
But the ruling classes never learn. Here at home, the Biden administration, in thrall to "climate change" theorists, is busy throwing wrenches into the gears of American industries just as destructively as Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro did in Venezuela and the Rajapaksa regime has done in Sri Lanka.
Among President Joe Biden's first acts in the White House was shutting down the Keystone XL Pipeline and throttling drilling for oil and natural gas on federal lands. Those decisions and others like them have sent fuel prices — especially diesel fuel — soaring, and with them, the costs of everything else.
Biden refuses to discuss increasing production with American companies. Instead, he's has gone hat-in-hand to Middle Eastern countries, begging them to increase production. (They refused.)
He is also tapping the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve, leaving America even more vulnerable should we encounter a fuel crisis not of our own making.
None of this should surprise anyone with a modicum of common sense or any experience with business, both of which are in short supply in government.
What's true in Sri Lanka was true in the former Soviet Union and is true in Sacramento. When people who have no concept of how to start or run a business decide that they will control entire industries, the inevitable result is collapse.
Socialists, environmentalists and the government officials whose strings they pull are about as economically ignorant as they come. Most have never started or run a business. They have no concept of the requirements of actual production.
Many cannot distinguish between costs and prices. They do not appreciate the difference between having to ask for people's money (as competitive businesses must) and being able to demand it (as governments do, via taxation).
Progressive activists of all stripes claim that the changes they promote will make business "accountable" and the system more "fair." Neither claim is supported by evidence.
Too much government control over business does not eliminate corruption but breeds it. Business leaders soon realize that their survival depends not upon pleasing customers but bribing government officials.
And once producers are no longer accountable to consumers, product and service quality goes right into the toilet. (Assuming, of course, that you can get a toilet. A staggering number of the global population — in countries without truly democratic governments or robust, entrepreneurially capitalistic economies — still doesn't have indoor plumbing.)
And, like killing the goose that lays golden eggs, transforming the U.S. into a command-and-control style economy with decisions driven by ideologues pitching scientifically unproven (or worse, disproven) theories will not better or more fairly distribute the goods and services that private enterprise creates. It will slowly constrict production and provision of those goods and services — just as Biden's policies are doing now — until it's no longer possible to produce at all.
When that happens, millions starve. (As seen in yet another example of failed collectivism, Mao Zedong's "Great Leap Forward" in 1960s China.)
There are some (arguably fringe) environmentalists who might not be devastated by that result. Paul Ehrlich authored "The Population Bomb," a 1968 bestseller with doomsaying overpopulation predictions.
Ehrlich's wild-eyed predictions never came to pass but did prompt government policies responsible for some of the worst human rights abuses in history. (Author Charles C. Mann laid this out in grim detail in an excellent 2018 article for Smithsonian magazine.)
Despite that, Ehrlich is still calling for "a massive reduction in the number of humans" on earth.
Others — only slightly less extreme than Ehrlich — describe their ideal system as one of global "democratic eco-socialism," where a small group of elites will decide what everyone on the planet gets to have and do.
Regardless of their pet theories or reasons for wanting it, history shows that central planners and their top-down, command-and-control economics never work. Their theories are inevitably wrong in ways they did not anticipate; their desired goals don't materialize; and the unintended consequences of their errors are even more destructive than the problems they allegedly sought to solve.
The United States is not — yet — on the brink of collapse. But economic policies preached by the ignorant and the arrogant can destroy our prosperity and peace, just as they have in the countries that took that path.
More than 100 million people have died and untold amounts of wealth have been destroyed proving this point over and over again. We ignore the lesson at our peril.
Laura Hollis is a professor of teaching at the Mendoza College of Business, as well as a professor of business law and entrepreneurship at Notre Dame. Her career as an attorney has spanned 35 plus years. Her legal publications have appeared in the Temple Law Review, Cardozo Law Review, and the Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy. Dr. Hollis has been a freelance political writer since 1993, writing for The Detroit News, HOUR Detroit magazine, Townhall.com, and the Christian Post. Read Reports by Prof. Hollis — More Here.