Skip to main content
Tags: irgc | iraq | hezbollah
OPINION

'Peace Through Strength' on Iran Ends 45-Year Stalemate

overseas nation of the middle east global realpolitik and war

A police officer stands guard beneath a poster of Iran's former leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei - March 10, 2026 - Tehran, Iran. (Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

Judd Dunning By Wednesday, 11 March 2026 02:43 PM EDT Current | Bio | Archive

Between 1979 and 1981, American diplomats were held hostage for 444 days.

In 1983, Iranian-backed Hezbollah bombed the United States Marine barracks in Beirut, killing 241 American servicemen.

In 1996, the Khobar Towers bombing killed U.S. personnel in Saudi Arabia. After 2003, Iranian-armed militias killed hundreds of American soldiers in Iraq.

In 2026, Iranian-supported groups strike shipping lanes, oil infrastructure, and civilian populations across multiple countries.

Concurrently, Tehran incrementally advances its nuclear capabilities between negotiations.

For 47 years, Iran’s calibrated aggression was designed to stay just below open hot war actions meriting decisive retaliation.

Yet every time the United States considers confronting Iran directly, Americans fret about Iraq 2.0.

When President Donald Trump authorized "Operation Epic Fury" against Iran, critics immediately predicted invasion and occupation.

Yet Iraq was a war to rebuild a country. Iran is an effort to restore deterrence.

History shows the difference matters.

In 1986, after Libyan-sponsored terrorists killed Americans in Berlin, President Ronald Reagan ordered a limited strike on Muammar Gaddafi command infrastructure.

Without an invasion, Libyan terrorism declined sharply.

In 1988 the U.S. Navy destroyed much of Iran’s fleet in Operation Praying Mantis after Iranian mining operations damaged a U.S. warship. Tehran backed down and soon accepted a ceasefire.

In 2017 the United States struck Syria's Shayrat airbase following chemical attacks on civilians. No occupation followed, and chemical attacks subsequently dropped significantly.

In 2020, a U.S. strike on Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps Commander (IRGC) Qassem Soleimani was widely predicted to ignite regional war.

Instead, escalation peaked quickly and subsided.

Each case proved that limited force can prevent larger war when it restores calculation.

Iran's governing structure explains why deterrence repeatedly erodes.

Authority ultimately rests with the Supreme Leader and the IRGC.

The IRGC controls ballistic missiles and coordinates proxy networks.

Proxies include Hezbollah in Lebanon, Shiite militias in Iraq, armed factions embedded within Assad's Syria, and the Houthis in Yemen.

This structure allows Tehran to project force globally while avoiding direct consequences. Iran’s pattern is attack indirectly, negotiate afterward, advance position, and then repeat.

Parallel to this strategy is Iran’s nuclear program. International monitoring reports document enrichment levels approaching weapons-usable thresholds and expansion of advanced centrifuge capacity.

The objective has never been sudden breakout, but incremental leverage. Each technical step alters bargaining power while avoiding decisive confrontation.

Economic policy reinforces the same model.

Iran has expanded non-dollar oil trade with China and increased financial coordination with Russia through alternative settlement channels and sanction-evasion shipping networks.

These mechanisms do not replace the global dollar system, but they reduce pressure enough to sustain long-term proxy conflict.

Military and financial insulation now operate together.

The consequences extend beyond geopolitics to society itself. Iran once possessed one of the most educated urban populations in the region.

Following the 1979 revolution, political authority centralized under clerical rule while civil freedoms contracted. International investigations following the Mahsa Jina Amini protests documented mass arrests and lethal crackdowns.

Amnesty International recorded over 800 executions in 2023 alone.

Women face compulsory dress enforcement and custody deaths.

Dissidents, journalists, minorities and LGBTQ+ individuals face criminal penalties under state law.

Beyond territorial competition, this conflict is a governing system that relies simultaneously on external confrontation and internal control.

Operation Epic Fury attempts to change the incentives sustaining that system. Its objective is not occupation or societal transformation.

It's attaching consequences to decision-makers rather than allowing violence to be permanently outsourced to militias.

Critics warn that escalation inevitably produces endless war. Yet four decades of avoiding decisive action produced endless low-grade conflict.

American hesitation during the Arab Spring allowed the most organized factions, not necessarily the most representative, to dominate outcomes.

Passivity shaped the region as surely as intervention would have.

If Iran's leadership structure weakens, the immediate outcome would most likely be consolidation by existing security institutions, followed by controlled succession.

Broader political evolution would depend on internal societal forces over time, not foreign occupation. Strategic pressure alters the environment in which those internal decisions occur.

Success is not measurable by regime collapse or occupation.

What matters is reduced proxy attacks, safer shipping lanes, slower nuclear progress, and restored predictability.

Peace through strength means preventing prolonged conflict by restoring consequences. Leadership sometimes requires accepting criticism in the present to reduce danger in the future.

President Trump has shown a willingness to make decisions unconstrained by short-term approval. He acted not to avoid controversy, but to address a strategic problem left unresolved for generations.

Whether one supports or opposes the policy politically, the clear principle is that  deterrence only exists when it is demonstrated.

"Operation Epic Fury" is not Iraq 2.0. It is an attempt to lay closure to a 47-year stalemate . . .  before it becomes something far worse.

Sometimes the choice is not between war and peace, but between prolonged instability and decisive prevention.

Host of "Unapologetic with Judd Dunning" on KABC AM 790, Judd is a Newsmax regular guest commentator. He's represented by Karen Gantz Literary Management (www.karengantzliterarymanagement.com) and for radio and public relations by Sandy Frazier (www.SandyPundits.com). Read more Judd Dunning Insider articles --- Click Here Now

© 2026 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


JuddDunning
"Operation Epic Fury" is not Iraq 2.0. It's an attempt to lay closure to a 47-year stalemate . . .  before it becomes something far worse. Sometimes the choice is between prolonged instability and decisive prevention.
irgc, iraq, hezbollah
846
2026-43-11
Wednesday, 11 March 2026 02:43 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.
Join the Newsmax Community
Read and Post Comments
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
 
TOP

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the Newsmax App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved