New survey results showed party authorship of legislation means a great deal to Republican and Democrat voters.
That's the takeaway from a new Politico polling experiment that tested whether Americans react more to the substance of policies or to which party claims credit for them.
The answer, according to the survey, is overwhelmingly the latter — a finding that underscores how deeply partisan cues shape voter behavior and presents an opportunity and a risk for President Donald Trump heading into the midterms.
The Politico Poll, conducted with Public First, asked 2024 Trump and then-Vice President Kamala Harris voters to react to a series of hypothetical policy proposals.
The twist: Each proposal was randomly labeled as coming from Democrats or from Trump and Republicans. The policy ideas themselves stayed the same — only the party branding changed.
The result: dramatic opinion swings of 20 to 30 points based solely on authorship.
For example, a plan to subsidize home purchases flips support almost entirely depending on who proposes it.
When labeled a Republican idea, Trump voters backed it by a wide margin while Harris voters opposed it.
When Democrats were credited, Democratic support surged and Republican backing collapsed. The substance didn’t matter — the label did.
From a conservative perspective, the poll confirms what many on the right have long argued: Today’s political divide is driven less by policy disagreement than by tribal loyalty and distrust of the opposing party.
Voters increasingly treat legislation as partisan signaling rather than problem-solving.
That dynamic also revealed a potential opening for Trump.
Politico noted that when traditionally left policies, such as student loan forgiveness or government-backed health insurance, were hypothetically proposed by Trump and Republicans, GOP support jumped sharply while Democrat support remained relatively high.
In those scenarios, partisan gaps narrowed or even disappeared.
In one striking example, Republican support for student loan forgiveness rose to 50% when it was framed as a Trump-backed plan, nearly matching Democrat support. A similar pattern emerged with a hypothetical minimum wage increase.
By contrast, traditionally conservative policies such as tax cuts produced the opposite effect.
When Democrats proposed a 10% income tax cut, both parties supported it. When Republicans proposed it, GOP backing soared and Democrat support plunged.
According to the Politico poll results, Democrats are far more willing to oppose policies they otherwise support if Republicans champion them, while GOP voters show greater flexibility when Trump himself is the messenger.
That finding dovetails with recent real-world examples of bipartisan voting driven less by ideology than by leadership and framing.
As The New York Times reported Wednesday, the House passed a massive defense authorization bill with broad bipartisan support, even as it codified major elements of Trump's national security agenda.
Party leaders on both sides ultimately backed the bill despite internal objections. That was a reminder that when stakes are high, partisan reflexes can be overridden.
Still, the Politico poll cautions that polling hypotheticals aren’t governing realities.
Republicans can’t simply rebrand every progressive idea without risking backlash from their base or violating core conservative principles.
But the poll did expose that Democrat voters appear far more reactive to party branding than to policy outcomes.
Charlie McCarthy ✉
Charlie McCarthy, a writer/editor at Newsmax, has nearly 40 years of experience covering news, sports, and politics.
© 2025 Newsmax. All rights reserved.