Skip to main content
Tags: clarence thomas | supreme court | 1977 | ruling

Justice Thomas Seeks to Upend 1977 Supreme Court Ruling

By    |   Thursday, 13 June 2024 01:53 PM EDT

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Thursday wrote that the high court should revisit a 47-year-old ruling that allows associations to bring a lawsuit on behalf of its members, saying the court in 1977 was "mistaken."

Thomas was part of the Supreme Court's 9-0 ruling on Thursday that said the plaintiffs in the case of the abortion pill mifepristone lacked legal standing to challenge the Food and Drug Administration's approval of the drug.

SCOTUS ruled, in part, that the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine chose the wrong forum to press its case against the FDA the pill.

In a concurring opinion, Thomas questioned the precedent set by SCOTUS in 1977 that allows for "third-party standing doctrine." Thomas said the court should revisit its ruling in the 1977 case "Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Comm'n."

In that case, the Supreme Court ruled that associations could bring a suit on behalf of its members if certain conditions were met, Newsweek reported.

Thomas dismissed that in his concurring opinion.

"Applying these precedents, the Court explains that the doctors cannot establish third-party standing to sue for violations of their patients' rights without showing an injury of their own," Thomas wrote. "But, there is a far simpler reason to reject this theory: Our third-party standing doctrine is mistaken.

"As I have previously explained, a plaintiff cannot establish an Article III case or controversy by asserting another person's rights. So, just as abortionists lack standing to assert the rights of their clients, doctors who oppose abortion cannot vicariously assert the rights of their patients."

Further, Thomas wrote: "I am particularly doubtful of associational-standing doctrine because the Court has never attempted to reconcile it with the traditional understanding of the judicial power. Instead, the Court departed from that traditional understanding without explanation, seemingly by accident. To date, the Court has provided only practical reasons for its doctrine."

Mark Swanson

Mark Swanson, a Newsmax writer and editor, has nearly three decades of experience covering news, culture and politics.

© 2025 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.

Newsfront
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Thursday wrote that the high court should revisit a 47-year-old ruling that allows associations to bring a lawsuit on behalf of its members, saying the court in 1977 was "mistaken."
clarence thomas, supreme court, 1977, ruling
310
2024-53-13
Thursday, 13 June 2024 01:53 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.
Join the Newsmax Community
Read and Post Comments
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
 

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© 2025 Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the Newsmax App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© 2025 Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved