Tags: 2020 Elections | Coronavirus | Hillary Clinton | Polls | Voting Rights | civil | rights

Mass Mail-In Ballots: 'The Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations'

Mass Mail-In Ballots: 'The Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations'
(Candyce Herman/Dreamstime)

By Sunday, 23 August 2020 07:04 AM Current | Bio | Archive

When the U.S. Civil Rights Commission meets on Friday, it will welcome its newest member. J. Christian Adams is a Justice Department veteran and seasoned ballot-integrity litigant and activist. President Donald J. Trump wisely named Adams to the Commission, to guide it toward sensible work and restrain the far-Left tendencies of its Democratic members and staff.

Adams should start by scuttling the Commission’s latest project: To weaponize COVID-19 and push universal mail-in ballots, Democrats’ flavor-of-the-month. This spectacularly sloppy practice blasts millions of ballots — requested or not — to every voter on a state’s rolls, even those who have relocated or died.

At best, this promises messy results. At worst, this is an on-the-knees plea for vote fraud.

The Commission will consider a draft report that argues that COVID-19 makes mail-in ballots a medical necessity. These crafty liberals begin with the tragic fact that the often-deadly Chinese virus has weighed especially heavily against blacks and other minorities in general, due to existing medical conditions, subpar medical care, and other woeful factors that ensnare specific patients.

From this sad reality, the Commission’s Left infantilizes voters of color and assumes that they cannot handle myriad challenges to casting ballots. The entire paper reeks of what President George W. Bush called "the soft bigotry of low expectations."

Requiring notarized signatures makes it harder to cast phony ballots. This is too much for Commission Democrats. They complain that voters of color endure a "lack of access to items such as transportation and printers."

The report quotes Rep. Marcia Fudge, D-Ohio, who told the Commission, "It is difficult to remain socially distant if voters are forced to find witnesses or notaries to sign their ballots."

The Commission report also claims that underprivileged voters have trouble acquiring stamps and basic office supplies. The report cites Kristen Clarke, President of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. She moaned that Ohio’s absentee-ballot request process "presented challenges to many voters, particularly low-income voters, who lack access to printers, postage, or envelopes."

Asking minority voters to complete change-of-address forms also demands too much of them. As the draft report states, "If they cannot get their absentee ballot applications or ballots mailed to their new or temporary address, minority voters who have moved may have a harder time meeting strict absentee ballot deadliness [sic]."

The Commission should worry primarily about disenfranchisement.

Alas, mass-mail-in-ballots are perfect for making votes vanish.

According to the USPS’s inspector general, for 2018, "We found that the Postal Service’s nationwide service performance score for Election and Political Mail was 95.6 percent, or slightly below its goal of 96 percent."

Imagine that USPS satisfies its own standards and delivers 96% of the ballots to which it is entrusted. So, only 4% of ballots would disappear. If the same 135,719,982 Americans who voted in 2016 did so again, then a mere 5,428,799 ballots would go astray. This many totally absent ballots could throw the election the wrong way. Given that Hillary Clinton won Minnesota by a margin of 1.52%, and Donald J. Trump secured Michigan by just 0.23 percent, a USPS promise to lose just 4% of ballots is nauseatingly inadequate.

Unlike the Commission draft, America’s highest-profile authority on the Chinese virus does not believe the pathogen merits an all-mail election.

According to federal COVID-19 guru, Dr. Anthony Fauci, "There’s no reason why we shouldn’t be able to vote in person or otherwise." As he told ABC News on August 14: “If you go and wear a mask, if you observe the physical distancing, and don’t have a crowded situation, there’s no reason why shouldn’t be able to do that."

The infirm and those vulnerable to COVID-19 should be free to request absentee ballots, as has been possible for decades. Everyone else should go vote at the polls on Election Day and hope that the COVID cure also eradicates the political pandemic of mass-mail-in ballots.

Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News Contributor, a contributing editor with National Review Online, and a senior fellow with the London Center for Policy Research. Read Deroy Murdock's Reports — More Here.

© 2020 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


   
1Like our page
2Share
Murdock
The Civil Rights Commission’s Left infantilizes voters of color and assumes that they cannot handle myriad challenges to casting ballots. The entire paper reeks of what President George W. Bush called "the soft bigotry of low expectations."
civil, rights, fraud, fauci
682
2020-04-23
Sunday, 23 August 2020 07:04 AM
Newsmax Media, Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved