Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - In Google Play
Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - On the App Store
Skip to main content
Tags: NBA | NFL | Hillary Clinton | Mitt Romney

Markets Best Predictor of 2016 Presidential Race

John Stossel By Thursday, 04 December 2014 09:05 AM EST Current | Bio | Archive

Want to bet on tomorrow's NFL game between Chicago and Dallas? I do.
Newspapers and websites all over America tell their readers that Dallas is favored by three points. That's the spread posted by bookies. Millions will be bet on that game, and billions will be bet on other games this weekend — college football, NBA games, NHL matches, UFC events, etc.

Most of these bets are illegal. This is not a good thing. Recently, National Basketball Association (NBA) commissioner Adam Silver became the first major professional sports commissioner to endorse legalizing sports betting. In the New York Times, he wrote, "Gambling has increasingly become a popular and accepted form of entertainment in the United States. Most states offer lotteries." They do, and states give worse odds than bookies.

Silver writes, "There is an obvious appetite among sports fans for a safe and legal way to wager." But bills to legalize betting go nowhere in Congress. Casinos oppose them because they don't want competition. They are joined by people who consider gambling immoral.

"Bootleggers and Baptists" is what economist Bruce Yandle called these coalitions. Bootleggers got rich off Prohibition. Just as Prohibition created Al Capone, bans on betting create crime, depriving Americans of useful information — such as who is likely to be the next president.

The pundits don't know. In 2012, conservative pundits confidently predicted a Romney victory. This year, Democrats predicted they'd keep the Senate. We in the media try to rely on scientific polls. Except they aren't so great either.

In Maryland, most polls had the Democratic candidate for governor up by double digits, but the Republican won. On average, polls underestimated Republican performance by 4 percent. Pollsters and pundits rarely suffer much penalty for being wrong. People figure these expert guesses are the best anyone can do.

But they aren't. When politicians allow people to put their money where their mouths are, bettors do a better job predicting future events. Bettors are better.

Last month, I wrote about how U.S. regulators shut down Intrade, a site that allowed people to bet on all sorts of things. Before elections, Intrade's bettors consistently out-predicted the pundits.

In 2012, Intrade gave Obama a 90 percent chance of winning, while pundits still said the race was "too close to call." Gallup predicted a Romney win.

Although American regulators killed Intrade, the British online prediction market Betfair still operates. It gave 89 percent odds that Republicans would win the Senate.

By the way, Betfair now gives Hillary Clinton a 40 percent chance of being the next president. Prediction markets like Betfair, PredictIt.com and Predictious.com allow bettors to predict everything from the gender of England's next royal baby to the winner of the next Nobel Peace Prize.

The Iowa Electronic Markets has outperformed political polls 74 percent of the time since 1988. Why? First, although individual bettors are no more enlightened than any one pundit, a large and diverse group of bettors usually is.

Second, people are more realistic when betting than when answering a survey. Polls suffer from a self-reporting bias. Participants say what they think they should rather than what they actually feel. With money on the line, forecasts are more accurate. So allowing betting helps us make better predictions about the future.

Luckily, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) recently gave New Zealand's University of Wellington permission to run a prediction market in the U.S. The site, PredictIt.com, allows users to bet on elections, court cases, regulatory decisions, and more.

Unfortunately, regulators will allow no more than 5,000 traders to make bets on a given contract — that is, a predicted outcome — and each trader can bet no more than $850. That will limit the site's prediction ability, but at least America will allow one site that will generate real predictions instead of just hot air. Legalization efforts might get farther if we stopped thinking of betting as a vice and instead recognized that it's a useful part of rational decision-making.

There's knowledge to be tapped in people's heads about what will happen next, and markets, as usual, are the best way to unleash that wisdom.

John Stossel is host of "Stossel" on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of "No They Can't! Why Government Fails, but Individuals Succeed," "Give Me a Break," and "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." Read more reports from John Stossel — Click Here Now.

© Creators Syndicate Inc.

There's knowledge to be tapped in people's heads about what will happen next, and markets, as usual, are the best way to unleash that wisdom.
NBA, NFL, Hillary Clinton, Mitt Romney
Thursday, 04 December 2014 09:05 AM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.
Join the Newsmax Community
Read and Post Comments
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the NewsmaxTV App
Get the NewsmaxTV App for iOS Get the NewsmaxTV App for Android Scan QR code to get the NewsmaxTV App
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved