Biden, Dems Won't Know What Hit Them on November 3

First of two parts.

"We now have the liberal playbook and we know what they are doing, and we are using it against them. Unlike the Democrats though, we aren't out to destroy our society, we are out to save it." — Mark R. Levin 

It'll be very interesting to see how the Democrat base responds to the election results on the evening of November 3 or morning of November 4.

But it won't be new.

We all witnessed it on November 8, 2016. The tears, the histrionics, the disbelief and finally … the rage, hatred and viciousness of the "poor sports"otherwise known as Liberal Democrats.

The faces of these people turned tyrants, rotated in an instant from the gleeful joy of poor winners ready to lord their victory over their opponents into one of tragic, pathetic and dangerous subhumans. It was as instantaneous as the crumpling of an infant's face after some great trauma.

Since those images flashed across our screens, I have thought that these pitiable personalities amounted to far less than others who love America. Our country wanted to try a nonpolitician who would scramble the D.C. cesspool into something recognizable as good government. What's their problem?

After four-plus years of the most hateful, threatening and treacherous situations, I am sure my original thoughts about what I saw on that 2016 night were absolutely spot-on. If not understated.

So what will happen?

I firmly believe that we will know the roll of the dice early on the evening of Election Day 2020. It will become convincingly apparent in the very early evening, perhaps 6 or 7 p.m., that President Trump will be the victor in a historic landslide.

It won't be Nixon in 1972 (520 electoral votes and 49 states) or Reagan in 1984 (525 electoral votes and 49 states) but it will be a good margin better than Trump's historic win in 2016 (304 electoral votes and 30 states).

Granted, Nixon's and Reagan's ultimate landslides were against incompetent opponents in McGovern and Mondale, but the No. 1 job of the party is to select the most qualified candidate with the highest probability of winning. The DNC has proven totally inept and highly untrustworthy to accomplish this task, as evidenced by their "selection" of a problematic, disjointed Biden.

Strangely, I've heard zero pundits or talking heads on cable compare the wide margin Trump received against what some are calling the "most awful, unlikeable candidate ever," Hillary Clinton. Or how he will fare against the increasingly incoherent/delusional Joe Biden. If Trump won 30 states against Hillary, then you'd have to be oblivious to predict Trump winning anything less than 40 states against this cardboard cutout of a presidential candidate.

What about the polls? They're telling us Biden is ahead, you might say.

You can safely and rationally ignore all polls. Why? Because there was a creepy decision sometime in the 1980s or '90s, wherein the DNC and other America-haters colluded with their salivating sycophants in the media to rig the polls to convince American voters that the blue candidates were the best and most equipped to win any election.

We saw the results of this in 2016, 2000 & 1992 when the Democrats were starting to perfect their "poll deceptions" for Clinton over H.W. Bush. It worked then but hasn't worked since.

Polls are inherently unreliable.

The Gallup and Roper polls were the gold standard of polls.

Well, around the late 1990s, we had arguably "fake polls" proliferate. Were they specially designed to elect unqualified, Democratic Party puppets? Were these polls totally manufactured? Were such polls generated by names associated with prominent pollsters? They seemed to employ seemingly preposterous formulas/algorithms. Did they take over with the media's able assistance? Perhaps the recent reemergence of the Gallup organization has served to level the playing-field in the arena of surveys and polls – generally speaking?

This is why we had a junior senator from Illinois and "community organizer" elected president who began running as soon as sworn into the Senate.

There are three main ways to rig an election, presuming that's something you want:

• You can ask questions that slant radically to the side you're trying to cheat to victory.
• You can undersample the opposition and oversample your side in the poll; a favorite deviancy of the DNC during this and the last elections.
• Or, you can just outright fabricate the entire poll through fantasy, lying and/or fabrication. In other words, there's not a speck of truth to be found anywhere in said poll.

The Dems favor all three.

'Nuff said.

So, please consider what I was doing with Obama's activities. After a short period during which I gave our new president the benefit of the doubt, if he was for something, I went in the exact opposite direction on that issue. If he was against something, I quickly was for it.

If the polls are telling you one thing — such as Biden is up over Trump in Florida by 18 points — just know in your heart and brain that it is total twaddle. "Biden and Trump are tied in Arizona," CNN shrieked recently. Horse puckey. "Biden's ahead in Texas," another Marxist media source of some ill-repute crowed. Sheer stupidity.

"The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything." — Joseph Stalin

Bill Robinson has appeared on Fox News, CNN, PBS, Bloomberg, BBC and had his own segment on SKY News. For seven years was the only conservative columnist for the insufferably liberal Huffington Post. He has written columns and articles for The Wall Street Journal Europe, Forbes.com, Fortune Small Business, The Financial Times, The Moscow Times, United Airline's Hemispheres Magazine and many others. Bill may be reached at: bill@relentlessmarketing.com Read Bill Robinson's reports — More Here.