If Bartlett's ever puts together a collection of insultingly deflating quotations, it should include President Barack Obama's take on business success before a crowd in Virginia the other day: "If you've been successful, you didn't get there on your own."
Obama was explaining — as is his wont — why the rich should pay more taxes. They might have had a great teacher. Or they drive on public roads and bridges. "If you've got a business — you didn't build that," the president explained, apparently in the serene confidence that he wasn't speaking to an audience bristling with proud business owners. "Somebody else made that happen."
 |
The Obama theory of entrepreneurship is that behind every successful businessman, there is a successful government.
(Getty Images) |
The Obama theory of entrepreneurship is that behind every successful businessman, there is a successful government.
Everyone is helpless without the state, the great protector, builder and innovator. Everything is ultimately a collective enterprise. Individual initiative is only an ingredient in the more important work when "we do things together."
The Obama riff is a direct steal from Elizabeth Warren, the Democrat Senate candidate in Massachusetts who sent liberal hearts aflutter by throwing the same wet towel on the notion of individual success a few months ago.
The Obama/Warren view is a warrant for socialization of the proceeds of success. Behind its faux sophistication is a faculty-lounge disdain for business, and all those who make more than tenured professors by excelling at it. Behind its smiley we're-all-in-it-together facade is a frank demand: You owe us.
For that most American figure of the self-made man, exemplified most famously by Benjamin Franklin and Abraham Lincoln, President Obama wants to substitute the figure of the guy who happened to get lucky while not paying his fair share in taxes.
What a dreary and pinched view of human endeavor. What a telling insight into his animating philosophy.
In his Virginia remarks, greeted with warm applause, Obama took down a notch anyone who has made it: "I'm always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart.
There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something — there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there."
True enough, and we should value the dignity of all work, no matter how humble. But the hallmark of the man of extraordinary accomplishment isn't simply work.
Some of us may work as hard as Steve Jobs. Few of us are as single- minded, risk-taking, shrewd or visionary. Millions of us could work 12-hour days for years, yet never come up with the idea for the iPad, let alone successfully manufacture and market it.
To redefine Steve Jobs as the product of the (necessary and unremarkable) infrastructure and government services around him is to devalue human creativity.
The Obama formulation goes something like this: Steve Jobs couldn't get to work every day without roads; he couldn't drive safely on those roads without a well-regulated system of driver's licenses; ergo, the San Jose, Calif., DMV practically built Apple.
And the likes of Steve Jobs had better pay higher taxes to fund the foundations of their greatness. Needless to say, no man is an island. We are a product of our families, schools and churches.
Without the liberty and rule of law that characterize America, entrepreneurship would indeed be impossible. Any successful American who is not a patriot is a rank ingrate. But the president believes that among the highest expressions of patriotism are a 39.6 percent top individual tax rate and a 25 percent capital-gains rate.
There are few phrases that President Obama likes less than "on your own." He considers it a lie when people think they've made it on their own, and he thinks that the most damning thing that can be said about the Republican vision is that it will leave people on their own.
For him, "we're in this together," and the inspiring institution embodying that togetherness is none other than the Internal Revenue Service.
Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review. He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, and a variety of other publications. Read more reports from Rich Lowry — Click Here Now.
© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.