The New York Times editorial of Dec. 26 titled “A Living Wage, Long Overdue” supports legislation pending before the City Council to require developers receiving public subsidies of $1 million or more to pay to the holders of full-time jobs a “living wage.”
This wage is defined as $10 per hour plus benefits or $11.50 per hour without benefits for at least 10 years, which pay scale effectively for those developers seeking city subsidies to build becomes the city’s minimum wage, contrary to the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour now mandated and binding in the U.S.
Bizarrely, the Times editorial proposes an exception, stating, “The bill’s sponsors should also consider exempting grocery stores in areas that need fresh food markets.”
Why not exempt all projects in areas of the city desperately in need of jobs? The unemployment rate for minorities in the country is double that of whites. In black and Hispanic communities, the unemployment rate is over 18 percent. Perhaps the Times writer is a vegan.
In support of its position, the Times cites an expert in Los Angeles which adopted a “living wage” law, “that he was unaware of any project that was cancelled because of the wage requirement.”
The Times editorial writer had only to look at the Times’ own news stories to learn that in the Bronx in 2007 when the City Council imposed such a requirement on a developer that would have developed the Kingsbridge Armory in the Bronx into a retail mall making available 575,000 square feet, providing private sector construction jobs and permanent jobs in the businesses created, the developer withdrew its offer to go forward.
That Kingsbridge Armory remains undeveloped to the present day. No jobs, no taxes, no upgrading of the neighborhood.
I would support a national law creating a minimum wage of $10 plus benefits or $11.50 per hour without benefits, or any other reasonable increase for those at the minimum wage level. But I would do so only if it applied to all states, not simply to New York City.
We live in perilous times. In Europe, the European Union is trying desperately to prevent five nations — Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece, and Spain (PIIGS) — from going bankrupt. All of those nations apparently lived beyond their means, taking on national debt to provide services which they could not afford and creating private-sector benefits raising the cost of doing business that helped bring these nations to their economic knees.
If raising the minimum wage to $10 and $11.50 is such a good idea, why didn’t the progressive Democrats do it nationally when they had majorities in both Houses? Why didn’t the president at that time offer such a program?
Does it make sense for New York City to risk its economic future and see developers turning to New Jersey, Connecticut, and other states in the Northeast, rather than come to New York City to build, creating construction jobs and permanent jobs in the new businesses established?
I hope the City Council is not emboldened to do what the labor unions are demanding of them — their role is to engage in collective bargaining — especially now that the New York Times editorial board has given the City Council cover.
I truly fear for the future of this city as the pressures build on the candidates for mayor and the City Council to support and enact such legislation.
© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.