×
Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - In Google Play
VIEW
×
Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - On the App Store
VIEW
Skip to main content
Tags: supreme court | limits | property

Supreme Court Starts to Set Limits on Govt's Power to Seize Property

Supreme Court Starts to Set Limits on Govt's Power to Seize Property
(AP)

By    |   Wednesday, 07 June 2017 11:26 AM

The Supreme Court's unanimous ruling Monday to curb the government's ability to seize property from criminal conspirators, even if they didn't profit from the crime, is the latest sign of the court's changing opinion on civil asset forfeiture.

"Congress did not authorize the government to confiscate substitute property from other defendants or co-conspirators," wrote Justice Sonia Sotomayor for the majority, referring to the Comprehensive Forfeiture Act of 1984.

"It authorized the government to confiscate assets only from the defendant who initially acquired the property and who bears responsibility for its dissipation."

Prior to this decision, prosecutors could send a forfeiture order to a low-level member of a criminal organization for far more than they make off it.

"If you were the schmuck who got caught and you were a bit player and you never saw 98 percent of the proceeds from the scheme you were involved in, you would still be socked with a forfeiture order for 100 percent of those proceeds, and that judgment would follow you around for the rest of your life," Barry Pollack, president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, told HuffPost.

"What the court is doing is just simply saying, to use these tools, you have to prove the allegations that you're making ― the mere fact that you allege something doesn't make it true, and there has to be a basis in reality for the government to pursue assets," he added.

"If what you really want to accomplish is to get that money back, you're going to have to do the hard work of finding the person or the company that ended up with the money and get it from them."

Public interest attorney Dan Alban of Institute for Justice, which advocates for forfeiture reform, told the HuffPost that Sotomayor "could have just ended without the discussion of the history of forfeiture law and the traditional limits on the use of forfeiture law, but she included a pretty long discussion of it."

© 2022 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Newsfront
The Supreme Court's unanimous ruling Monday to curb the government's ability to seize property from criminal conspirators, even if they didn't profit from the crime, is the latest sign of the court's changing opinion on civil asset forfeiture.
supreme court, limits, property
330
2017-26-07
Wednesday, 07 June 2017 11:26 AM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.
Join the Newsmax Community
Read and Post Comments
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
 
TOP

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the NewsmaxTV App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved