Skip to main content
Tags: scott walker | 2016 | pundits | gop | republican | presidential | election

Scott Walker 2016: What 5 Leading Pundits Say About GOP Presidential Hopeful

By    |   Wednesday, 31 December 2014 08:12 PM EST

A Scott Walker campaign for president in 2016 wouldn't be a huge surprise — the Wisconsin governor has astounded observers with his finesse at winning elections in the face of troubling adversity.

Since the Republican was first elected governor in 2010, he has overcome one recall election and triumphed in a re-election, making him a potential GOP presidential candidate in 2016.

Urgent: Do You Support Scott Walker for the GOP Nomination? Vote Here Now

Albert Hunt, in a column for Bloomberg, says Walker is sometimes viewed as lacking charisma, but he has proven he can prevail over daunting odds with his ability to raise money for his victory during the recall election.

"The Wisconsin governor is one of the few early hopefuls acceptable to both the establishment and business-friendly elements of the party and to movement conservatives, who are attracted by his successful efforts against labor unions in a Democratic-leaning state," Hunt wrote. Walker’s successful re-election campaign in 2014 strengthens this view.

Jay Miller wrote in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that he is a Republican who voted for Walker, but would not vote for him if he ran for president. Aside from lacking foreign policy experience, Walker also lacks a college degree and hasn’t explained why he didn’t finish college, Miller noted.

"No president since Harry Truman has lacked a college degree and regardless of Truman’s accomplishments, that was a different era, "Miller wrote. "Back then a college degree was distinctive. Now it is a prerequisite in most people’s minds."

Urgent: Who Should the GOP Nominate in 2016? Vote Here Now

Chris Cillizza of The Washington Post writes that Walker is among those in a crowded GOP establishment field to oppose tea party candidates such as Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.

Before the 2014 election, Cillizza opined that Walker still had "to win re-election against a well-financed Democrat" to prove his worth as a strong GOP candidate in a 2016 presidential campaign. His re-election victory could now help him stand out within the Republican establishment.

Ana Marie Cox of the Daily Beast called Walker "bland-faced" and described him as "not a good candidate, he is a good-enough candidate."

Following Walker’s re-election, he could have focused on his qualities for a future in national politics, "but instead Walker delivered essentially the same stump speech he’s given going on two years now — it’s long on Washington vs. Wisconsin rhetoric, but short on policy specifics," Cox wrote.

John Podhoretz, in a New York Post column, wrote that what Walker might lack in personality is countered by his results as a candidate and governor. Walker has won three elections — including the recall — in four years in a state that voted for President Barack Obama. His economic reforms may have saved Wisconsin taxpayers $3 billion.

Although he is "colorless and unexciting to watch," events leading up to the 2016 presidential campaign could determine "whether Walker is best admired from afar, or whether he’s going to take the national GOP by storm," Podhoretz wrote.

Vote Now: Which Potential GOP Candidate Would You Support in 2016?

© 2025 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


FastFeatures
A Scott Walker campaign for president in 2016 wouldn't be a huge surprise — the Wisconsin governor has astounded observers with his finesse at winning elections in the face of troubling adversity.
scott walker, 2016, pundits, gop, republican, presidential, election, race
510
2014-12-31
Wednesday, 31 December 2014 08:12 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.

PLEASE NOTE: All information presented on Newsmax.com is for informational purposes only. It is not specific medical advice for any individual. All answers to reader questions are provided for informational purposes only. All information presented on our websites should not be construed as medical consultation or instruction. You should take no action solely on the basis of this publication’s contents. Readers are advised to consult a health professional about any issue regarding their health and well-being. While the information found on our websites is believed to be sensible and accurate based on the author’s best judgment, readers who fail to seek counsel from appropriate health professionals assume risk of any potential ill effects. The opinions expressed in Newsmaxhealth.com and Newsmax.com do not necessarily reflect those of Newsmax Media. Please note that this advice is generic and not specific to any individual. You should consult with your doctor before undertaking any medical or nutritional course of action.

 
TOP

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the Newsmax App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved