Skip to main content
Tags: prayer | in | school | moment of silence

Prayer in School Debate: 4 Cases Where Moment of Silence Solved Prayer Issue

Prayer in School Debate: 4 Cases Where Moment of Silence Solved Prayer Issue
Whether laws related to prayer or moments of silence in schools violate the First Amendment? (Dreamstime.com)

By    |   Sunday, 30 November 2014 05:46 PM EST

The moment of silence has taken the place of prayer in school in some areas of the United States. While some consider the moment of silence to be a useful alternative to prayer in school, others characterize it as a back-door attempt or ploy to get prayer in school.

Courts use what is known as the Lemon test to determine whether laws related to prayer or moments of silence in schools violate the First Amendment. The test refers to the 1971 case Lemon v. Kurtzman, in which Chief Justice Warren Burger wrote that to be constitutional a statute must meet three requirements: 1) have "a secular legislative purpose," 2) neither advance nor inhibit religion, and 3) it must not foster "an excessive government entanglement with religion."

ALERT: Should Prayer Be Allowed in Public Schools? Vote Now

In its 1985 ruling in Wallace v. Jaffree, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down an Alabama moment-of-silence law because sponsors of the law said its purpose was to return prayer to school. While the ruling struck down the Alabama law, it also cleared the way for lower courts to uphold moment-of-silence laws provided the secular intent was clear.

Here are four cases when moment-of-silence laws have been upheld.

Sherman v. Koch (Illinois)
In 2010, a federal appeals court in Chicago upheld an Illinois law that requires a moment of "silent prayer or silent reflection" in public schools. The law was upheld because its doesn’t require the time to be spent in prayer and because it has a practical purpose in settling down students.

Croft v. Perry (Texas)
In 2009, a federal court upheld a moment-of-silence law in Texas. U.S. District Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn wrote that “the Court finds legitimate the secular purpose of allowing all types of thoughtful contemplation,” according to Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Brown v. Gilmore (Virginia)
In 2001, a federal appeals court upheld a moment-of-silence law in Virginia, which requires schools to begin each day with a minute that allows students to meditate, pray or engage in any other silent activity. The court found that "By providing this moment of silence, the state makes no endorsement of religion."

Bown v. Gwinnett County School District (Georgia)
In 1997, a federal court upheld the Georgia Moment of Quiet Reflection in Schools Act, which allows for a quiet moment for silent prayer or meditation at the beginning of each school day. The court determined that the law satisfies all three prongs of the Lemon test.

VOTE NOW: Do You Support Prayer in Public Schools?

Related stories:

© 2025 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


FastFeatures
The moment of silence has taken the place of prayer in school in some areas of the United States. While some consider the moment of silence to be a useful alternative to prayer in school, others characterize it as a back-door attempt or ploy to get prayer in school.
prayer, in, school, moment of silence
449
2014-46-30
Sunday, 30 November 2014 05:46 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.

PLEASE NOTE: All information presented on Newsmax.com is for informational purposes only. It is not specific medical advice for any individual. All answers to reader questions are provided for informational purposes only. All information presented on our websites should not be construed as medical consultation or instruction. You should take no action solely on the basis of this publication’s contents. Readers are advised to consult a health professional about any issue regarding their health and well-being. While the information found on our websites is believed to be sensible and accurate based on the author’s best judgment, readers who fail to seek counsel from appropriate health professionals assume risk of any potential ill effects. The opinions expressed in Newsmaxhealth.com and Newsmax.com do not necessarily reflect those of Newsmax Media. Please note that this advice is generic and not specific to any individual. You should consult with your doctor before undertaking any medical or nutritional course of action.

 
TOP

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the Newsmax App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved