Skip to main content
Tags: Loving v. IRS | facts

5 Facts to Know About Loving v. IRS Case

By    |   Sunday, 19 July 2015 10:20 AM EDT

In 2014, independent tax preparers emerged victorious as an appeals court ruled that the IRS did not have the authority to license them. The case was Loving v. IRS.

Here are five important facts about the case.

1. Test Requirements
The IRS sought to license tax preparers, hoping such a measure would help improve their professional standards, according to Forbes. They created test requirements and regulation rules and fees associated with a certification process in 2011, which was dubbed a "scheme that forces tax preparers to get IRS permission before they work," the Institute for Justice noted.

Urgent: Is the IRS Good for America? Vote Now

2. Lawsuit Filed in 2012
It took two years from when the case was originally filed in 2012 for it to work its way through the courts. It was filed on behalf of three plaintiffs who were independent tax preparers, who argued that the IRS in seeking to regulate them, had exceeded its authority.

3. U.S. District Court
In 2013, a U.S. District Court agreed that they were right, noting that "Congress never gave the IRS the power to license tax preparers and the IRS cannot give itself that authority," Forbes wrote of the case.

4. Appeal
The IRS appealed the ruling but it was affirmed in 2014 by U.S. District Court Judge James E. Boasberg.

5. H&R Block Reaction
While independent tax preparers were delighted that the appeals court ruled in their favor, retail tax preparation giant H&R Block expressed disappointment, with its CEO Bill Cobb calling it an affront to taxpayers. He noted, according to Forbes: "It is outrageous that all consumers don't enjoy basic protections with such a significant financial transaction as tax preparation. Something is out of whack when you are better protected when getting your haircut than when sitting across the desk from a tax preparer. All consumers should have access to the protection that our clients receive when working with our highly trained tax professionals."

The IRS returned fees paid by those preparers it had already tested or the ones who had scheduled to test, it noted on its website.

Vote Now: How Do You Feel About the IRS?

© 2026 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


FastFeatures
In 2014, independent tax preparers emerged victorious as an appeals court ruled that the IRS did not have the authority to license them. The case was Loving v. IRS.
Loving v. IRS, facts
364
2015-20-19
Sunday, 19 July 2015 10:20 AM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.

PLEASE NOTE: All information presented on Newsmax.com is for informational purposes only. It is not specific medical advice for any individual. All answers to reader questions are provided for informational purposes only. All information presented on our websites should not be construed as medical consultation or instruction. You should take no action solely on the basis of this publication’s contents. Readers are advised to consult a health professional about any issue regarding their health and well-being. While the information found on our websites is believed to be sensible and accurate based on the author’s best judgment, readers who fail to seek counsel from appropriate health professionals assume risk of any potential ill effects. The opinions expressed in Newsmaxhealth.com and Newsmax.com do not necessarily reflect those of Newsmax Media. Please note that this advice is generic and not specific to any individual. You should consult with your doctor before undertaking any medical or nutritional course of action.

 
TOP

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the Newsmax App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved