Skip to main content
Tags: keystone xl | pipeline | vote | wisconsin | senators

How Did Wisconsin Senators Vote in Narrow Defeat of Keystone XL Pipeline?

By    |   Wednesday, 14 October 2015 09:44 PM EDT

Wisconsin's two U.S. senators voted on opposing sides March 4, 2015, as opponents of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline sustained President Barack Obama’s veto of a bill that would have brought about the pipeline’s construction.

Sixty-two Senators voted to overturn the veto — five short of the 67 needed to accomplish that — while 37 cast ballots against the move and one didn’t vote. Senior Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, a Republican, voted to override the veto while junior Wisconsin Sen. Tammy Baldwin, a Democrat, voted to sustain it.

Johnson had released a statement on November 2014
supporting construction of the pipeline, saying, “Americans hungry for work could have benefited long ago if the Democrats and the president had listened, as multiple studies, now confirmed, showed that building the pipeline is the most environmentally friendly method of transporting oil from Canada.”

Baldwin opposed construction of the pipeline when the Senate voted to approve it Jan. 29, 2015.

ALERT:
Is Global Warming a Hoax? Vote Now

“Congress should not be in the business of approving individual pipelines, and I have serious concerns about the precedent this vote has set. If constructed, Keystone XL oil would flow from Canada, through American communities, and would be exported to other countries – potentially leading to increases in gas prices in the Midwest. This would be a price Wisconsin families and businesses should not have to pay,” Baldwin said in a statement.

The votes by Johnson and Baldwin followed along party lines in the debate over the Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry 830,000 barrels of crude oil daily.

The pipeline would run from Canada through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas.

Republicans supported building the pipeline to create jobs while Obama raised concerns about Keystone XL’s potential effects on climate change and questioned how much of an effect it would have on employment.

VOTE NOW:
Are You Concerned About Global Warming?

The Senate voted 62-36 on Jan. 29 to pass a bill seeking to force construction of the 840-mile pipeline, which Obama had vowed to veto so long as federal environmental reviews continued, reported The Washington Post. Of the Senate’s 54 Republicans, 53 voted in favor of the bill – along with nine Democrats. The other Republican, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, did not vote.

The House of Representatives then voted 270-152 on Feb. 11 to approve the bill, which Obama vetoed Feb. 24.

All 54 Senate Republicans, including Johnson, were among the 62 Senators who voted March 4 in favor of the unsuccessful attempt to override Obama’s veto. Eight Democratic Senators voted in favor of the override and 37 Senate Democrats, including Baldwin, voted against it while one Democrat — Joe Donnelly of Indiana, who had voted in favor of the bill on Jan. 29 — did not vote.

North Dakota Republican Sen. John Hoeven, who introduced the bill, said after the failed override attempt that pipeline supporters would try to attach Keystone pipeline approval to another bill this year, Reuters reported.

URGENT: Do You Think Global Warming Is a Hoax? Vote Here Now!

Related Stories:

© 2026 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


FastFeatures
Wisconsin's two U.S. senators voted on opposing sides March 4, 2015, as opponents of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline sustained President Barack Obama’s veto of a bill that would have brought about the pipeline’s construction.
keystone xl, pipeline, vote, wisconsin, senators
533
2015-44-14
Wednesday, 14 October 2015 09:44 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.

PLEASE NOTE: All information presented on Newsmax.com is for informational purposes only. It is not specific medical advice for any individual. All answers to reader questions are provided for informational purposes only. All information presented on our websites should not be construed as medical consultation or instruction. You should take no action solely on the basis of this publication’s contents. Readers are advised to consult a health professional about any issue regarding their health and well-being. While the information found on our websites is believed to be sensible and accurate based on the author’s best judgment, readers who fail to seek counsel from appropriate health professionals assume risk of any potential ill effects. The opinions expressed in Newsmaxhealth.com and Newsmax.com do not necessarily reflect those of Newsmax Media. Please note that this advice is generic and not specific to any individual. You should consult with your doctor before undertaking any medical or nutritional course of action.

 
TOP

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the Newsmax App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved