×
Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - In Google Play
VIEW
×
Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - On the App Store
VIEW
Tags: Global Warming | keystone xl | pipeline | connecticut | senators | vote

How Did Connecticut Senators Vote in Narrow Defeat of Keystone XL Pipeline?

By    |   Friday, 02 October 2015 04:08 PM

The Keystone XL pipeline, the single biggest issue between environmentalists and energy lobbyists, was denied approval for construction in 2014 by the margin of a single vote, narrowly defeating the largely Republican-supported Senate bill 2280.

Approval of the bill would have allowed the TransCanada Keystone Pipeline company to run a pipeline from Canada through the Midwest to Gulf Coast refineries waiting for crude oil to be pumped down from Canadian tar sands.

Despite all 45 Senate Republicans voting for the bill, they failed to secure enough votes across the aisle in the 59-41 defeat. Only 14 Senate Democrats voted in favor of it against 39 from their own party in addition to two independents.

VOTE NOW: Are You Concerned About Global Warming?

However, while 60 votes would have passed it, the bill would have needed 67 votes, a two-thirds majority, to circumvent President Obama's certain veto.

Connecticut's Democratic Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Christopher Murphy sided with the majority of their party against the passage of S.2280. Both cited environmental concerns as reason for their oppostion to the Keystone XL pipeline.





URGENT: Do You Think Global Warming Is a Hoax? Vote Here Now!

© 2021 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


FastFeatures
The Keystone XL pipeline was denied approval for construction in 2014 by a single Senate vote, narrowly defeating the largely Republican-supported bill. Connecticut's Democratic Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Christopher Murphy sided with the majority of their party against the Keystone XL pipeline.
keystone xl, pipeline, connecticut, senators, vote
245
2015-08-02
Friday, 02 October 2015 04:08 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

PLEASE NOTE: All information presented on Newsmax.com is for informational purposes only. It is not specific medical advice for any individual. All answers to reader questions are provided for informational purposes only. All information presented on our websites should not be construed as medical consultation or instruction. You should take no action solely on the basis of this publication’s contents. Readers are advised to consult a health professional about any issue regarding their health and well-being. While the information found on our websites is believed to be sensible and accurate based on the author’s best judgment, readers who fail to seek counsel from appropriate health professionals assume risk of any potential ill effects. The opinions expressed in Newsmaxhealth.com and Newsmax.com do not necessarily reflect those of Newsmax Media. Please note that this advice is generic and not specific to any individual. You should consult with your doctor before undertaking any medical or nutritional course of action.

 
TOP

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the NewsmaxTV App