Skip to main content
Tags: guns | smith wesson | gun history

Smith and Wesson's Controversy: How Firearms Brand Stirred Up Debate

By    |   Tuesday, 07 April 2015 12:04 PM EDT

Smith & Wesson, a globally-renown name in firearms, has been the focal point of controversy among those who support the right to bear arms and those seeking gun control.  During the administration of former President Bill Clinton, Smith & Wesson’s owners stirred up the debate over gun control by agreeing to gun regulations.

ALERT: Should Obama Have More Control Over Guns? Vote Now

According to Business Insider, the move almost put the company out of business.

Clinton’s legislation called for a limit to magazine sizes, as well as requirements for locking devices and limitations on firearms. Smith & Wesson’s support of these measures enraged the National Rifle Association.

The arms maker, which was once the face of firearms for soldiers and law enforcement, was considered a pariah by the NRA for agreeing to safety regulations being proposed.

VOTE NOW: Do You Support a Ban on All Fully Automatic Rifles?

The New York Times reported that Smith & Wesson had agreed to adopt the regulations in 2000 in order to settle lawsuits being brought forward by state and federal agencies.

Events like the Newton, Conn. school shooting have led to companies bowing to public pressure and government regulation in order to stay in business.

But with the competition folding, as Winchester firearms folded and Colt Manufacturing struggled, Smith & Wesson has rebounded.

"No company in modern history has come back from the dead like Smith & Wesson," said Russ Thurman, editor of Shooting Magazine, told The New York Times. "In the dark days for Smith & Wesson, you'd go to a trade show and there would be an invisible cone of silence around the Smith & Wesson booth. Now you have to get into a fist fight to get close to their displays."

Not only has the company regained the business of the United States government, but Smith & Wesson also serves foreign entities. This “Buy American” company provides firearms to the Afghan police and the Iraqi government.

In 2005, Smith & Wesson signed a $20 million contract to provide firearms to the Afghan police. They gave law enforcement 22,500 9mm double-action semi-automatic pistols. The brand is one of a handful of companies on the approved list of gun makers to provide weapons to the country.

Selling overseas, however, has been a problem for Smith & Wesson. In 2014, the company was found guilty of bribing officials in Pakistan and Indonesia, offering free weapons while vying for contracts. The company was hit with a $2 million fine by the U.S. government, CNN reported. 

But the U.S. didn’t hold the fine against the company for long.

In early 2015, the company was back in the running for U.S. contracts, hoping to win the bidding war for the contract to provide the Army with weapons. An Army contract would bring in immediate revenue, and association with the Army would give the brand icon status. According to CNN, military weapons earn a cult following, which generates into large revenues.

This article does not constitute legal advice. Check the current gun laws before purchasing or traveling with a firearm.

URGENT: Do You Support Obama's Plans for Stricter Gun Control? Vote Now

© 2026 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


FastFeatures
Smith & Wesson, a globally-renown name in firearms, has been the focal point of controversy among those who support the right to bear arms and those seeking gun control.
guns, smith wesson, gun history
527
2015-04-07
Tuesday, 07 April 2015 12:04 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.

PLEASE NOTE: All information presented on Newsmax.com is for informational purposes only. It is not specific medical advice for any individual. All answers to reader questions are provided for informational purposes only. All information presented on our websites should not be construed as medical consultation or instruction. You should take no action solely on the basis of this publication’s contents. Readers are advised to consult a health professional about any issue regarding their health and well-being. While the information found on our websites is believed to be sensible and accurate based on the author’s best judgment, readers who fail to seek counsel from appropriate health professionals assume risk of any potential ill effects. The opinions expressed in Newsmaxhealth.com and Newsmax.com do not necessarily reflect those of Newsmax Media. Please note that this advice is generic and not specific to any individual. You should consult with your doctor before undertaking any medical or nutritional course of action.

 
TOP

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the Newsmax App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved