Login or Register
Welcome , Settings |  Logout

States Consider Mandatory Insurance for Gun Owners

Friday, 22 Feb 2013 09:13 AM

By Lisa Barron

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Lawmakers in at least six states are weighing legislation that would make liability insurance mandatory for gun owners.

The state legislators — including those in California, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, and Pennsylvania —want to provide a financial incentive for safe behavior, as those with less dangerous weapons or safety locks could qualify for lower rates, reports The New York Times.

“I believe that if we get the private sector and insurance companies involved in gun safety, we can help prevent a number of gun tragedies every year,” David Linsky, a Democratic state representative in Massachusetts, told the newspaper.

Urgent:
Should Obama Ban Guns? Vote in Poll

Linsky wants to require gun owners to buy insurance, believing it will encourage more responsible behavior and reduce accidents. “Insurance companies are very good at evaluating risk factors and setting their premiums appropriately,” he said.

But many advocates for gun owners oppose the idea on the grounds that law-abiding citizens should not have to buy insurance in order to exercise their right under the Second Amendment to bear arms.

The National Rifle Association and other gun groups, however, are in favor of voluntary liability policies, and some, including the United States Concealed Carry Association, are in fact selling their own policies to cover part of the legal costs stemming from self-defense shootings.

States have in the past considered legislation requiring gun owners to buy liability insurance, but none have yet passed a bill doing so.

Nelson Lund, the Patrick Henry professor of Constitutional Law and the Second Amendment at George Mason University School of Law, proposed the idea in a 1987 article in the Alabama Law Review.

“If this were done, the private insurance market would quickly and efficiently make it prohibitively expensive for people with a record of irresponsible ownership of guns to possess them legally but would not impose unreasonable burdens on those who have the self-discipline to exercise their liberty in a responsible fashion,” he wrote.

© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
More . . .
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax community.
Register to share your comments with the community. Already a member? Login
Note: Comments from readers do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of Newsmax Media. While we attempt to review comments, if you see an inappropriate comment you can block it by rolling over the comment, clicking the down arrow and selecting "Flag As Inappropriate."
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Top Stories
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Portman, Thune Call for More Hearings on IRS Targeting Scandal

Tuesday, 21 May 2013 23:23 PM

Two Republican members of the Senate Finance Committee on Tuesday called for more hearings into the Internal Revenue Ser . . .

Some US Utilities Say They're Under Constant Cyber Attack

Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:42 PM

Several power utilities say they face a barrage of cyber attacks on their critical systems, a report by two Democratic l . . .

U.S. Democrats Call for Controls on Tax-exempt Groups at IRS Hearing

Tuesday, 21 May 2013 18:41 PM

As they joined Republicans on Tuesday in bashing the Internal Revenue Service for targeting conservative groups that sou . . .

 
 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved