National Political Committees Must Return Stanford Donations

Wednesday, 22 Jun 2011 05:56 PM

 

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Five Democratic and Republican national political committees must return more than $1.7 million in contributions received from indicted financier R. Allen Stanford to his court-appointed receiver, a federal judge ruled.

U.S. District Judge David Godbey in Dallas today awarded final judgment in favor of receiver Ralph Janvey, who is marshalling assets to repay investors allegedly swindled of more than $7 billion through what the government claims was a Stanford-directed Ponzi scheme.

Godbey ordered the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Inc. to return $1,037,347; the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Inc., $218,273; the National Republican Congressional Committee, $260,291; the National Republican Senatorial Committee, $90,960; and the Republican National Committee, $140,241. The sums represent the donations the groups got from Stanford plus prejudgment interest, according to Godbey’s order.

Stanford, 61, denies all wrongdoing in connection with civil and criminal allegations that that he defrauded investors through the sale of bogus certificates of deposit sold by his Antigua-based Stanford International Bank Ltd.

“This ruling represents an important victory for the Stanford receivership and the thousands of victims of the Stanford Ponzi scheme,’’ Kevin Sadler, lead attorney for Janvey, said in an e-mail today. “Unfortunately, the political committees waged a costly campaign to thwart the receiver’s efforts to recover the monies they received from the Stanford Ponzi scheme. The receiver will be filing appropriate papers with the court to recover the hundreds of thousands of dollars in attorneys fees and expenses he was forced to incur in this case.’’

Mark Shank, a lawyer for the Republican committees, and John Devaney, a lawyer for the Democratic Committees, didn’t immediately return voice or e-mail messages seeking comment on today’s ruling.

The criminal case is U.S. v. Stanford, 09cr342, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas (Houston). The SEC case is Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stanford International Bank, 09cv298, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas (Dallas).

© Copyright 2013 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.

Share:
More . . .
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Top Stories
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Award-winning Journalist Michael Hastings Dies

Tuesday, 18 Jun 2013 22:08 PM

Award-winning journalist and war correspondent Michael Hastings has died in a car accident in Los Angeles.BuzzFeed Edito . . .

Ron Paul: Gold Price Could Go to Infinity

Tuesday, 18 Jun 2013 22:05 PM

How high can the price of gold go? Former Congressman and presidential candidate Ron Paul thinks it could go to infinity . . .

Texas Rep. Poe Saved by Arizona Congressman, Aide from Choking

Tuesday, 18 Jun 2013 20:56 PM

A Texas congressman who was choking on a piece of popcorn is thanking a fellow Republican from Arizona and a House staff . . .

 
 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved