Login or Register
Welcome , Settings |  Logout

Ohio Exotic Animal Ban Sparks Concerns

Friday, 02 Dec 2011 03:19 AM

By Sandy Fitzgerald

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
A proposed ban on exotic animal ownership in Ohio is already running into legislative opposition from congressmen concerned animals could be illegally seized through the law, the Columbus Dispatch said.
 
Republican State Sen. Troy Balderson is expected to sponsor the proposed legislation, which would not go into effect until Jan. 1, 2014. Balderson’s home is about seven miles from a farm where in October law-enforcement officers killed 48 animals, including bears, lions, tigers, and wolves, that had been set free by their owner. Terry W. Thompson committed suicide after releasing the animals.
 
“I don’t want to ban exotic animals,” insisted Balderson. “Ohio has the most lenient laws in the country, and we need to do something about that. We need to protect people. We need to protect small business owners, and we need to protect the animals.”
 
However, Ohio Senate President Tom Niehaus expressed concerns about a recommendation empowering authorities to seize animals on the restricted species list if owners don’t voluntarily give them.
 
“I want to make sure we’re not doing some things that are too much of a reach,” Niehaus said. “If they’re being well taken care of or housed properly and not posing a danger to others, we have to ask questions about whether it’s appropriate to remove those animals.”
 
Animals on the banned list include panthers, hyenas, lions, tigers, primates, elephants, rhinoceroses, giraffes, hippopotamuses, crocodiles, pythons, boa constrictors, and wolf-dog hybrids.
 
Ohio Department of Natural Resources Director James Zehringer said the proposed rules would have prohibited Thompson from owning the animals.
 
Under the proposal, owners do not have to get rid of animals on the list before 2014, but they have to register them within 60 days of the effective date of the law. If the animals aren’t turned over by the deadline in two years, they would be “subject to immediate confiscation and forfeiture,” under the proposal.

© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
More . . .
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Send me more news as it happens.
 
 
Get me on The Wire
Send me more news as it happens.
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax community.
Register to share your comments with the community. Already a member? Login
Note: Comments from readers do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of Newsmax Media. While we attempt to review comments, if you see an inappropriate comment you can block it by rolling over the comment, clicking the down arrow and selecting "Flag As Inappropriate."
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Top Stories
 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved