Login or Register
Welcome , Settings |  Logout

Woodward: Obama Not Telling Truth on Sequester

Saturday, 23 Feb 2013 07:27 PM

By Paul Scicchitano

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Despite President Obama’s insistence that Republicans are to blame for the coming sequester, The Washington Post’s Bob Woodward maintains that the commander-in-chief need look no further than his own White House if he wants to blame someone.

“The president and (Treasury Secretary Jack) Lew had this wrong,” Woodward penned on Friday. “My extensive reporting for my book 'The Price of Politics' shows that the automatic spending cuts were initiated by the White House and were the brainchild of Lew and White House congressional relations chief Rob Nabors — probably the foremost experts on budget issues in the senior ranks of the federal government.”

Woodward, who is an associate editor at the Post, said the $85 billion in automatic spending cuts that are set to begin on Friday are surrounded by “misunderstanding, misstatements and all the classic contortions of partisan message management.” The cuts amount to a total of $1.2 trillion over 10 years.

Dick Morris: Protect Against ObamaCare with This Book

“Obama personally approved of the plan for Lew and Nabors to propose the sequester to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid,” asserted Woodward. “They did so at 2:30 p.m. July 27, 2011, according to interviews with two senior White House aides who were directly involved.”

Woodward also cited comments attributed to Nabors.

“Nabors has told others that they checked with the president before going to see Reid,” Woodward explained. “A majority of Republicans did vote for the Budget Control Act that summer, which included the sequester. Key Republican staffers said they didn’t even initially know what a sequester was — because the concept stemmed from the budget wars of the 1980s, when they were not in government.”

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney countered in a tweet that the goal was always to replace the cuts with a so-called grand bargain, reported Politico on Saturday.

"Super Committee's mandate was not to replace sequester w/spending cuts alone," Carney tweeted. "To suggest otherwise is willfully wrong."






© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
More . . .
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax community.
Register to share your comments with the community. Already a member? Login
Note: Comments from readers do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of Newsmax Media. While we attempt to review comments, if you see an inappropriate comment you can block it by rolling over the comment, clicking the down arrow and selecting "Flag As Inappropriate."
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Top Stories
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Ben Carson: Not Too Late to Stop Obamacare

Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:44 PM

Renowned pediatric neurosurgeon Benjamin Carson cautioned on Thursday that putting the embattled IRS in charge of overse . . .

Former US Defense Chief: Britain Too Slow in Addressing Homegrown Terrorism

Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:32 PM

The United Kingdom has a small but dangerous group of homegrown terrorists one it has failed to identify and deal with . . .

IRS' Lois Lerner Replaced, Now on Leave

Thursday, 23 May 2013 18:08 PM

Lois Lerner, the IRS official at the center of efforts to target conservative groups for years, has been placed on admin . . .

 
 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved