In a leaked internal Senate memo, details have emerged regarding the Biden administration's covert efforts to intertwine federal highway funding with what some critics are calling "woke priorities."

The memo sheds light on a strategy to leverage infrastructure investments as a means to advance social and cultural initiatives, a move that has sparked heated debate within political circles.

According to the confidential memo, the administration aims to allocate federal highway funds based on a set of criteria that includes considerations related to diversity, equity, and inclusion.

The document suggests that projects demonstrating a commitment to social justice initiatives, environmental sustainability, and community engagement will be given preferential treatment in the distribution of funds.

• Biden Can’t Argue Against This Proof of the Global Warming Hoax… Read HERE

Critics argue that linking highway funding to "woke priorities" could potentially divert resources away from essential infrastructure needs, prioritizing political agendas over the urgent requirements of repairing and upgrading the nation's aging highways and bridges.

Senators from both sides of the aisle have expressed concern over the potential politicization of infrastructure funding. Some argue that taxpayer dollars should be directed toward projects solely based on their merit, engineering feasibility, and the urgency of repairs, rather than becoming entangled with contentious political ideologies.

The memo's disclosure has prompted calls for transparency and a public debate on the role of social considerations in the allocation of federal funds. Advocates for the administration's approach argue that infrastructure investments provide a unique opportunity to address systemic inequalities and promote a more inclusive and sustainable future.

• How to Protect Yourself From the Global Warming Lie Costing You Money… Read MORE  

The Biden administration has yet to officially respond to the leaked memo, but the revelations are likely to become a focal point of discussions in the coming weeks, as lawmakers grapple with the broader implications of linking federal funding to social and political priorities within the realm of infrastructure development.