* Bill may give legal cover to banks, mortgage processors
* Senate quietly passed after many failed attempts
* Ohio Secretary of State calls timing "suspicious"
By Scot J. Paltrow
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A bill that homeowners
advocates warn will make it more difficult to challenge
improper foreclosure attempts by big mortgage processors is
awaiting President Barack Obama's signature after it quietly
zoomed through the Senate last week.
The bill, passed without public debate in a way that even
surprised its main sponsor, Republican Representative Robert
Aderholt, requires courts to accept as valid document
notarizations made out of state, making it harder to challenge
the authenticity of foreclosure and other legal documents.
The timing raised eyebrows, coming during a rising furor
over improper affidavits and other filings in foreclosure
actions by large mortgage processors such as GMAC, JPMorgan
and Bank of America.
Questions about improper notarizations have figured
prominently in challenges to the validity of these court
documents, and led to widespread halts of foreclosure
proceedings.
The legislation could protect bank and mortgage processors
from liability for false or improperly prepared documents.
The White House said it is reviewing the legislation.
"It is troubling to me and curious that it passed so
quietly," Thomas Cox, a Maine lawyer representing homeowners
contesting foreclosures, told Reuters in an interview.
A deposition made public by Cox was what first called
attention to improper affidavits by GMAC. Since then, GMAC,
JPMorgan and others have halted foreclosure actions in many
states after acknowledging that they had filed large numbers of
affidavits in which their employees falsely attested that they
had personally reviewed records cited to justify the
foreclosures.
Cox said the new obligation for courts to recognize
notarizations of documents filed by big, out-of-state
companies, would make it more difficult and costly to challenge
the validity of the documents.
The law, the "Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act,"
requires all federal and state courts to recognize
notarizations made in other states.
The law specifically includes "electronic" notarizations
stamped en masse by computers. Currently, only about a dozen
states allow electronic notarizations, according to the
National Notary Association.
"CONSTITUENTS" PRESSED FOR PASSAGE
After languishing for months in the Senate Judiciary
Committee, the bill passed the Senate with lightning speed and
with hardly any public awareness of the bill's existence on
Sept. 27, the day before the Senate recessed for midterm
election campaign.
The bill's approval involved invocation of a special
procedure. Democratic Senator Robert Casey, shepherding
last-minute legislation on behalf of the Senate leadership, had
the bill taken away from the Senate Judiciary committee, which
hadn't acted on it.
The full Senate then immediately passed the bill without
debate, by unanimous consent.
The House had passed the bill in April. The House actually
had passed identical bills twice before, but both times they
died when the Senate Judiciary Committee failed to act.
Some House and Senate staffers said the Senate committee
had let the bills languish because of concerns that they would
interfere with individual state's rights to regulate
notarizations.
Senate staffers familiar with the judiciary committee's
actions said the latest one passed by the House seemed destined
for the same fate. But shortly before the Senate's recess,
Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy pressed to have the
bill rushed through the special procedure, after Leahy
"constituents" called him and pressed for passage.
The staffers said they didn't know who these constituents
were or if anyone representing the mortgage industry or other
interests had pressed for the bill to go through.
These staffers said that, in an unusual display of
bipartisanship, Senator Jeff Sessions, the committee's senior
Republican, also helped to engineer the Senate's unanimous
consent for the bill.
Neither Leahy's nor Session's offices responded to requests
for comment Wednesday.
In background interviews, several Senate staffers denied
that it would have any adverse effect on the legal rights of
homeowners contesting foreclosures, and said the law was
intended only to remove an impediment to interstate commerce.
"SUSPICIOUS" TIMING
Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner told Reuters in an
interview that the law would weaken protection of homeowners by
requiring many states to accept lower standards for
notarizations.
She said it was "suspicious" that the law unexpectedly
passed just as the mortgage industry is facing possible big
costs from having filed false or improperly notarized
documents.
Notarizations are made by notaries licensed by individual
states. The purpose of notarizations is to attest to the
identity of the person whose signature is on a legal document.
For affidavits -- sworn statements filed in court cases --
the person who made the affidavit also is required to swear
under oath before a notary that the affidavit is true.
In recent depositions in several foreclosure cases, GMAC
and other mortgage processors' employees have testified that
they signed large numbers of affidavits without ever appearing
before the individuals who notarized them.
The bill was first sponsored by Aderholt in 2006. He told
Reuters in an interview that he proposed it because a court
stenographer in his district had asked for it due to problems
with getting courts in other states to accept depositions
notarized in Alabama.
Aderholt said organizations of court stenographers
supported the bill, but said he wasn't aware of any backing by
banks or other business groups.
Aderholt said that he hadn't expected the Senate to pass
the bill, and "we were surprised that it came through at the
eleventh hour there."
(Reporting by Scot Paltrow; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)
© 2026 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.