If you are a Secretary of State or Federal Judge, you are require to analyze plausibility of election fraud to allow for pleadings to be accepted. There are several types of fraud which could include illegal ballots, tainted ballots, intentional negligence, civil rights violations or oppression, and negligent adjudication or acceptance. There is even voter suppression such as the Keri Lake voter machine breakdowns.

What people are not talking about is the silent acceptance of fake, unsigned, undated, and late ballots where the rejection percentage changes are enough to change many elections from top to down ballot.

In the 2020 election, the millions of absentee ballots mailed or dropped in boxes in the states of Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Georgia was extremely large. However, the reduction in quality control was so bad, that the entire 2020 results could have been changed to a Trump victory just by throwing out the fake and tainted ballots that were unsigned, late, and undated.

1. : Approximately 1.9 million absentee ballots were returned and counted.
2. : Around 1.1 million being mailed, dropped, returned and then counted.
3. : Over 1.3 million absentee ballots were returned and counted​ (Ballotpedia)​​ (FactCheck.org)​​ (Elections Performance Index)​​ (Check Your Fact)​.

The Stats on Ballot Rejection Rates.

Arizona’s rejection rate went from .5 in 2018 to .3 in 2020 which is a 40% reduction in ballot quality control. Approximately 58% of Democrats and 42% of Republicans used mail-in or absentee ballots in Arizona. Thus, if tainted, unsigned, late or undated ballots were submitted, Democrats benefited from a much greater chance of getting these late ballots counted.

Georgia went from 3.1% rejection in 2018 to .4 in 2020 which is a 87.1% reduction in quality control, inspection, and rejection of fake or tainted ballots. Data indicates that about 65% of mail-in ballots were submitted by Democrats, while Republicans accounted for approximately 35%

Wisconsin went from 1.7% in 2018 to .2 in 2020.  * 1.7 to 0.2 is approximately 88.24% reduction in quality inspection of ballots. Around 60% of the mail-in ballots were from Democrats, and 40% were from Republicans​ See: (FactCheck.org)​​.

Needless to say, there are questions about the ballots of conservative districts being raided, stolen, and destroyed by terrorists and thieves that are paid to do so. Just this past month, police arrested criminals who had keys to local mailboxes stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars and value.

To estimate the statistical probability of Democrats getting tainted or fake ballots counted in Arizona, Wisconsin, and Georgia, we need to look at the change in rejection rates and the percentage of mail-in ballots submitted by Democrats and Republicans.

Arizona

• Rejection Rate Change: From 0.5% in 2018 to 0.3% in 2020, a 40% reduction.
• Mail-in Ballot Distribution: 58% Democrats, 42% Republicans.

Georgia

• Rejection Rate Change: From 3.1% in 2018 to 0.4% in 2020, an 87.1% reduction.
• Mail-in Ballot Distribution: 65% Democrats, 35% Republicans.

Wisconsin

• Rejection Rate Change: From 1.7% in 2018 to 0.2% in 2020, an 88.24% reduction.
• Mail-in Ballot Distribution: 60% Democrats, 40% Republicans.

Using these percentages, we can estimate the likelihood of tainted ballots benefiting Democrats due to reduced rejection rates.

1. :
   • Reduction in rejection rate: 3.1% - 0.4% = 2.7%.
   • Number of ballots potentially affected: 1.3 million * 2.7% = 35,100 ballots.
   • Democrat advantage: 35,100 * 65% = 22,815 ballots.
2. :
   • Reduction in rejection rate: 1.7% - 0.2% = 1.5%.
   • Number of ballots potentially affected: 1.1 million * 1.5% = 16,500 ballots.
   • Democrat advantage: 16,500 * 60% = 9,900 ballots.
3. :
   • Reduction in rejection rate: 0.5% - 0.3% = 0.2%.
   • Number of ballots potentially affected: 1.9 million * 0.2% = 3,800 ballots.
   • Democrat advantage: 3,800 * 58% = 2,204 ballots.
   • With the disparate impact and recent sabotage of the conservative voting districts in Arizona, this alone is a vicious type of voter suppression.

In sum, if there was any cheating, negligence or conscious overlooking of ballot integrity, the Democrats are favored in key swing states by early voting, mail-in voting, absentee voting, tainted votes, fraudulent votes, and late voting.

Not only that, there was enough intentional or conscious election integrity reduction and negligence, that just the percentage decrease in monitoring of ballots from 2018 to 2020 definitely could have changed the election.

Therefore, there is a 100% probability and plausibility that election negligence and unconscionably low rejection rates affected the election outcome especially if you add Michigan or Pennsylvania and other states where Trump was leading by hundreds of thousands of votes after election day 2020 was over.

We all know that 2020 election cases were denied by judges due to lack of comprehensive evidence. Further, lawyers know that the IQBAL plausibility standard is there to keep frivolous cases out of federal court.

However, since much of the new 2020 election negligence evidence, math, and data has been released over a 3 years period, the overwhelming plausibility is staring everyone in the face. This overwhelming evidence is available now without doing any discovery.

Those who think that the 2020 Election was riddled with negligence simply must provide this type detailed and specific factual allegations that show the claim is not just possible but plausible. Previously, the plausibility standard has led to valid claims being dismissed prematurely because victims may not have access to all the facts at the early stages of litigation.

The remaining factual allegations must be sufficient to raise a reasonable expectation that discovery will reveal evidence to support the plaintiff’s claim.

While it is a long shot, I personally believe that voters or plaintiffs may one day sue the Secretary of State in a class action to get their money back that was spent on a campaign where the election and results are obviously flawed.

In conclusion, the point of this article is that after 3 years of review, it is undeniable that that election of 2020 had so many flaws and mistakes with issues such as: late ballot counting, tainted ballot counting, unsigned ballots, and undated ballots that the impact of these mistakes most likely would have changed national, state, and local elections. At this point in time, anyone who says that a repudiation of the 2020 election accuracy is baseless is living in a fantasy land and does not understand math or federal court cases.

________________

Commissioner George Mentz JD MBA CILS CWM® is the first in the USA to rank as a Top 50 Influencer & Thought Leader in: Management, PM, HR, FinTech, Wealth Management, and B2B according to Onalytica.com and Thinkers360.com. George Mentz JD MBA CILS is a CWM Chartered Wealth Manager ®, global speaker - educator, tax-economist, international lawyer and CEO of the GAFM Global Academy of Finance & Management ®. The GAFM is a EU accredited graduate body that trains and certifies professionals in 150+ nations under standards of the: US Dept of Education, ACBSP, ISO 21001, ISO 991, ISO 29993, QAHE, ECLBS, and ISO 29990 standards. Mentz is also an award winning author and award winning graduate law professor of wealth management of one of the top 30 ranked law schools in the USA