Tags: Karzai | Afghan | democracy | fading

Hopes for Democracy in Afghanistan Fading

Wednesday, 31 March 2010 09:49 AM

KABUL, Afghanistan — Hopes of democracy are gradually fading in Afghanistan, say foreign and domestic observers. President Hamid Karzai is now so focused on his own status that he is ready to sacrifice any pretense of fair play to perpetuate himself and his family at the center of the power.

Just as worrying, in the eyes of many, is the fact that the international community that backs his administration with troops and treasure seems to be allowing Karzai free rein in the name of stabilization and expediency.

“Karzai is totally focused on staying in power,” said one Western official. This was echoed by sources within the presidential palace, where close advisers are becoming increasingly concerned that the president is spinning his own version of an executive coup.

Over the past several months, the Afghan president has taken several steps designed to cement his position at the expense of the other branches of government. The end game say insiders, may be a bid to amend the constitution to allow Karzai to remain in power indefinitely.

Coming up in late April in Kabul is Karzai’s much-vaunted Peace Jirga, in which up to 1,500 hand-picked delegates will discuss the president’s appeal for reconciliation with the insurgency.

One possible scenario, according to a long-time observer of Afghan politics, is that Karzai could use the event to declare a state of emergency, followed by a Constitutional Loya Jirga, or Grand Council, that could change the law in any way that the president deems fit.

“Things could get wild this spring,” said the political expert.

During the Parliament’s winter recess, Karzai issued a decree unilaterally “amending” the law that will govern parliamentary elections slated for September. He has toughened up the requirements for running for office, along the way neutering the one body that stood up to the egregious fraud perpetrated in his name during last year’s presidential poll — the Electoral Complaints Commission.

Formerly ECC commissioners were drawn from various institutions — three internationals and two Afghans. Under the new law, five commissioners will be Afghan. Few doubt that they will be chosen for their pliability by Karzai himself.

“It’s a disaster,” said one former ECC member, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Kai Eide, the former U.N. special representative in Afghanistan, negotiated a “compromise” in the last days before his departure in early March. Karzai has agreed to accept two internationals on the ECC, as a concession to Afghanistan’s “transitional” status.

“This was not due to international pressure,” said presidential spokesman Siyamak Herawi.

But while the Afghan and international media were busy celebrating Karzai’s “reversal,” experts were not so sure. The addition of two internationals does not necessarily mean the subtraction of two Afghans, they say.

“My guess is we’ll see seven or even nine commissioners,” said one election expert who is monitoring the process. “The law is neutral on the number of commissioners.”

The influence of the internationals can be diluted to the point of insignificance by an increase in the number of Karzai loyalists on the commission.

The August presidential elections were badly marred by systematic, organized ballot-rigging, a fact that Karzai has still not officially accepted. The ECC tossed out more than 1.2 million votes, depriving Karzai of a first-round victory and necessitating a runoff between Karzai and Abdullah. The runoff never occurred, because Abdullah withdrew, saying that he refused to participate in what he saw as an inherently corrupt process.

Karzai and his administration blame the foreign community for exaggerating the level of fraud, and insist that Karzai actually won the election. But the stigma of illegitimacy hangs over his administration, a fact for which he will not soon forgive the complaints commission.

“[Karzai] is taking his revenge on the ECC,” said Saleh Mohammad Registani, who was deputy campaign manager for Karzai’s chief rival in the elections, Dr. Abdullah Abdullah.

But he seems to be doing much more than that. In order to push through his amendments, Karzai used a mechanism in the law that was never designed to allow the president to shortcut the legislative process.

Article 79 of the constitution specifies that the president can adopt legislation “in emergency situations during a recess of the Wolesi Jirga [the Lower House of Parliament]. The legislative decrees become law after they are signed by the president.”

Parliament had 30 days to reject the decree after they reconvened, which was Feb. 20. But with just one week to go before the amendments pass into law by default, there has been little movement from the legislature.

One factor, say political specialists, has been the lack of reaction from the international community.

The U.N., which has the lead on elections, has been extremely cautious on the subject.

“Reactions were initially quite muted as all things were weighed up,” said U.N. spokesperson Dan McNorton.

The Americans have not provided much in the way of guidance, either.

“[Parliamentary Speaker Younus] Qanuni has said he will not put it on the agenda,” said a source close to the Parliament. “But he is actually waiting for a sign from the Americans that they are against it.”

That sign may be a long time coming. Department of State spokesperson P.J. Crowley actually called Karzai’s new law “a step forward” for Afghanistan’s democratization process.

© Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

1Like our page
Wednesday, 31 March 2010 09:49 AM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved