Tags: Afghanistan | Gitmo | Obama

Obama Stumbling Over Afghanistan, Gitmo

By Thursday, 22 October 2009 08:47 AM Current | Bio | Archive

Our nation has focused a great deal of attention during the past month on Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s substantial troop request for our mission in Afghanistan.

This is the sort of matter we should be talking about, because the debate between a counter-insurgency vs. counterterrorism approach, which is at the heart of this decision, is sure to set the tone for policies and missions well beyond the Afghan borders.

But as important as the debate is, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and field commanders are reminding us that there comes a point where the lack of action makes the decision for us.

This troop request comes with a reasonable window of opportunity. The president’s continued inaction on this front and his failure to come to a conclusion on a long-term strategy for our mission in Afghanistan creates uncertainty for our troops on the ground and puts into question our resolve in the ongoing war against international terrorists and those who aid and abet them.

However, another key component of our approach to combating terrorism and terrorists also is lingering without a conclusive plan and course of action: the closure of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility and the handling of the remaining detainees. Although the troop level debate has drawn all recent attention, this policy decision also carries tremendous impact.

As you will recall, President Obama signed executive orders on Jan 22 regarding Guantanamo Bay, interrogation techniques, and detention policies. One of the executive orders required that Gitmo be closed within a year.

However, as the months passed, it has become obvious to all, including the administration, that such a timetable was unfeasibly aggressive. In fact, even some of the most basic aspects of closing the base remain undecided at this point.

Whether the facility is closed by January 2010 or at a later date is not the only subject for discussion here. Rather, this quandary serves as yet another example of this administration’s inability to set and execute effective strategies when it comes to our fight against terrorism.

With a backlog of detainees waiting for trial and no clear plan on where to house them once the facility itself is closed, it is clear just how vital it was for the administration to come up with a comprehensive plan before pronouncing the closure of the facility.

Obvious as this is, it seems to have escaped the Obama administration, not just back in January, but even now, late in October.

On Tuesday, the administration achieved a minor victory with the Senate’s passage of an amendment to the $44 billion Homeland Security budget that will allow the government to continue to transfer detainees from the facility to the United States for prosecution — with the very telling caveat that before any additional transfers take place, the administration put a plan in place.

Yes, you heard that right: The Senate will allow terrorist suspects to come to the United States once the president actually comes up with a plan on what do with them once they are here.

No word yet on when just such a plan will be forthcoming. You can be sure I won’t be holding my breath.

This past Monday, the city council of Standish, Mich., took the initiative by voting 6-0 in support of the city’s willingness to proceed with plans that would allow the transfer of the remaining Guantanamo Bay detainees to the soon-to-be closed maximum security facility located in that small Midwestern town. Word is council would have passed the resolution even sooner had it not been trying so hard — and failing — to get straight answers out of Washington.

So while Congress passes measures allowing for transfer of detainees once a plan is developed and an administration asks to close the facility without any clear direction on how, at least we can count on the Standish City Council to take decisive action.

Perhaps once the people of Standish have settled the matter of Guantanamo Bay, they could help President Obama along by voting on a resolution concerning troop levels in Afghanistan. That is the type of decisive leadership that is certainly absent in Washington these days.

Mike Reagan, the elder son of the late President Ronald Reagan, is chairman and president of The Reagan Legacy Foundation (www.reaganlegacyfoundation.org). Look for his newest book, “Twice Adopted,” and other information at www.Reagan.com. E-mail comments to Reagan@caglecartoons.com.

© Mike Reagan

Our nation has focused a great deal of attention during the past month on Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s substantial troop request for our mission in Afghanistan.This is the sort of matter we should be talking about, because the debate between a counter-insurgency vs....
Thursday, 22 October 2009 08:47 AM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved