Tags: Outrage | Over | Sandy | Berger | Affair

Outrage Over Sandy Berger Affair

Sunday, 03 April 2005 12:00 AM

Notwithstanding his initial claims that the incident in which he secreted documents in his pants and socks was an "honest mistake," Sandy Berger copped a plea and got a dainty slap on the wrist.

Berger's theft and lying were neither honest NOR a mistake. He willfully, with malice aforethought and full knowledge of the severity of his crime, stole classified documents and destroyed some of them. The act is out-flipping-rageous. The arrogance of Berger in presuming that he could (and did) get away with it is way beyond aggravating. The sentence is infuriatingly absurd.

Once upon a time men were executed for less egregious offenses. Berger was sentenced to:

This travesty of justice is sufficient to gag any maggot.

Judge Earl Johnson Jr. once observed, "Poor people have access to the courts in the same sense that Christians had access to the lions." The collorary is also true. Wealth and/or power mitigate (or tarnish) justice in ways and means that mere mortals can only observe with unbridled annoyance.

Berger was the guy who was reportedly slated to be John Kerry's secretary of state if the unthinkable had occurred and Kerry had won the presidency. As Bill Clinton's national security adviser this guy was at the nexus of the malfeasant, incompetent intelligence-gathering and analysis that contributed to 9/11.

The sentence he received is an insult to every American (military and civilian) ever issued any security clearance. Chuck Colsen went to jail. Gordon Liddy went to jail. Sandy Berger goes on the speaking circuit and waits for Hillary?

The three-year suspension of his security clearance suggests that if (perish the thought) the Bush administration is succeeded by a Democrat, Sandy Berger could again find himself in the position of access to highly classified documents.

It challenges credulity that during the hearing no one even bothered to asked why he destroyed classified documents.

Initially Berger claimed his outrageous actions were "an honest mistake" … now he grudgingly admits, "It was a mistake, and it was wrong."

Normally, government is severely strict in matters dealing with security. A reasonable person might anticipate that in this ‘War on Terror' environment, we might be reasonably stricter.

Berger's plea agreement has to be approved by U.S. Magistrate Deborah Robinson, and sentencing is scheduled for July 8. Don't do it, Debbie!

There remains the serious question of whether Berger was "trying" to cover up the Clinton administration anti-terrorism policy and action embarrassments. Duh!

Despite the Berger criminal obfuscation attempt, it is a matter of record that Sandy had rejected three plans to go after Osama just prior to 9/11.

Sandy's sins were not unique. Former CIA Director John Deutch also was caught removing highly classified defense docs on his personal computer in 1999. He too should have gone the way of Liddy and Colsen, but Clinton blessed Deutch with a pardon.

By the way … Berger and Deutch both pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge. What is THAT? Abuse of power under the color of authority is a misdemeanor?! Stealing classified documents and destroying them is a misdemeanor?! A handful of marijuana scores a felony, but stuffing your socks and boxers with classified documents barely rates a ‘bad dog'? As John Stossel might say, "Give Me A Break!"

The Brits have The Official Secrets Act (http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts1989/Ukpga_19890006_en_1.htm ). During the Clinton administration there was an effort to enact official secrets legislation. Clinton eventually vetoed it.

When the investigation of Berger's theft became public last July, Democrats (who have a lot of experience at defending the indefensible) claimed the investigation was politically motivated. Where are they now that Berger has pleaded guilty and confirmed that his grossly inappropriate and criminal actions were neither "honest" NOR "a mistake"?

Berger should go directly to jail, should not pass go, and should not collect a single flipping penny.

104

© 2019 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

   
1Like our page
2Share
Pre-2008
Notwithstanding his initial claims that the incident in which he secreted documents in his pants and socks was an "honest mistake," Sandy Berger copped a plea and got a dainty slap on the wrist. Berger's theft and lying were neither honest NOR a mistake. He willfully,...
Outrage,Over,Sandy,Berger,Affair
636
2005-00-03
Sunday, 03 April 2005 12:00 AM
Newsmax Media, Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved