Tags: Defend | Marriage | Now!

Defend Marriage Now!

Wednesday, 29 September 2004 12:00 AM

"The future we will pass on to our children may well ride on the outcome of this vote. I am convinced that, unless we pass a constitutional amendment defining marriage in the United States as the union of a man and a woman, the U.S. Supreme Court in just a few years will 'announce' a federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage. We need only look to the reasoning in Lawrence v Texas, where the Court found that States could not 'demean' homosexual conduct. This reasoning, as the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and trial courts in the State of Washington have already concluded, may soon require every State to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

"If so, the core meaning of marriage will be radically altered. Throughout history, marriage founded on sexual complementarity, lifelong commitment, and the bearing and rearing of children has been the cornerstone of successful societies. Recognition of same-sex 'marriage' will reduce this vital institution to nothing more than official recognition of the personal preferences of any two, three, four or more 'marital partners.'

"No positive benefits will accrue from this radical revision. All of the probable consequences will be profoundly negative. Unfortunately, however, once marriage has been drained of all meaning, it may be impossible to undue the damage.

Richard wants you to know that you can make a difference. How?

For starters, refer to the list below of all the co-sponsors of the Federal Marriage Amendment and see if your representative is one of them. If your representative is on the list, call your representative and thank him or her for their support, urge them to stand fast, and to do whatever they can to get their colleagues to vote for the amendment, as well. If your representative is not a co-sponsor, call them too, and urge them to defend marriage.

Whether you call them or email them, focus on three points:

1. Preserving marriage is essential to passing on a healthy and strong society to our children.

2. You are convinced that a constitutional amendment is the only way we can protect marriage in the United States from being radically redefined by activist federal judges.

3. You want him or her to vote for the Federal Marriage Amendment.

It's that simple. Let your voice be heard. The momentum is gathering for and behalf of traditional marriage, and yet, if we don't reign in the judges now, popular support may become meaningless, as these self- appointed Gods in robes will continue to usurp the legislative powers from Congress and the people, sending down decrees from the bench as if from Heaven.

Or that other place.

Contact Steve at farrell@newsmax.com

Notes:

1. If you don't know your representative's name and phone number please visit http://www.defendmarriage.org/defendmarriage/callrep.cfm for a quick check.

2. Here is the list of Representatives who are co-sponsors of the Federal Marriage Amendment in alphabetical order:

Rep Aderholt, Robert B. [AL-4]

Rep Akin, W. Todd [MO-2]

Rep Alexander, Rodney [LA-5]

Rep Bachus, Spencer [AL-6]

Rep Baker, Richard H. [LA-6]

Rep Ballenger, Cass [NC-10]

Rep Barrett, J. Gresham [SC-3]

Rep Bartlett, Roscoe G. [MD-6]

Rep Barton, Joe [TX-6]

Rep Beauprez, Bob [CO-7]

Rep Bilirakis, Michael [FL-9]

Rep Blackburn, Marsha [TN-7]

Rep Blunt, Roy [MO-7]

Rep Boehner, John A. [OH-8]

Rep Bonilla, Henry [TX-23]

Rep Boozman, John [AR-3]

Rep Brady, Kevin [TX-8]

Rep Brown, Henry E., Jr. [SC-1]

Rep Brown-Waite, Ginny [FL-5]

Rep Burgess, Michael C. [TX-26]

Rep Burns, Max [GA-12]

Rep Burr, Richard [NC-5]

Rep Burton, Dan [IN-5]

Rep Calvert, Ken [CA-44]

Rep Cannon, Chris [UT-3]

Rep Cantor, Eric [VA-7]

Rep Carter, John R. [TX-31]

Rep Chocola, Chris [IN-2]

Rep Coble, Howard [NC-6]

Rep Cole, Tom [OK-4]

Rep Collins, Mac [GA-8]

Rep Crane, Philip M. [IL-8]

Rep Cubin, Barbara [WY]

Rep Culberson, John Abney [TX-7]

Rep Cunningham, Randy (Duke) [CA-50]

Rep Davis, Jo Ann [VA-1]

Rep Davis, Lincoln [TN-4]

Rep Deal, Nathan [GA-10]

Rep Doolittle, John T. [CA-4]

Rep DeMint, Jim [SC-4]

Rep Duncan, John J., Jr. [TN-2]

Rep Emerson, Jo Ann [MO-8]

Rep Everett, Terry [AL-2]

Rep Feeney, Tom [FL-24]

Rep Ferguson, Mike [NJ-7]

Rep Flake, Jeff [AZ-6]

Rep Forbes, J. Randy [VA-4]

Rep Franks, Trent [AZ-2]

Rep Garrett, Scott [NJ-5]

Rep Gingrey, Phil [GA-11]

Rep Goode, Virgil H., Jr. [VA-5]

Rep Goodlatte, Bob [VA-6]

Rep Gutknecht, Gil [MN-1]

Rep Hall, Ralph M. [TX-4]

Rep Hart, Melissa A. [PA-4]

Rep Hayes, Robin [NC-8]

Rep Hayworth, J. D. [AZ-5]

Rep Hefley, Joel [CO-5]

Rep Herger, Wally [CA-2]

Rep Hoekstra, Peter [MI-2]

Rep Hulshof, Kenny C. [MO-9]

Rep Hunter, Duncan [CA-52]

Rep Hyde, Henry J. [IL-6]

Rep Isakson, Johnny [GA-6]

Rep Istook, Ernest J., Jr. [OK-5]

Rep Janklow, William J. [SD]

Rep Johnson, Sam [TX-3]

Rep Jones, Walter B., Jr. [NC-3]

Rep Keller, Ric [FL-8]

Rep Kennedy, Mark R. [MN-6]

Rep King, Steve [IA-5]

Rep Kingston, Jack [GA-1]

Rep Lewis, Ron [KY-2]

Rep Linder, John [GA-7]

Rep Lucas, Frank D. [OK-3]

Rep Lucas, Ken [KY-4]

Rep Manzullo, Donald A. [IL-16]

Rep Marshall, Jim [GA-3]

Rep McCotter, Thaddeus G. [MI-11]

Rep McIntyre, Mike [NC-7]

Rep Miller, Candice S. [MI-10]

Rep Miller, Gary G. [CA-42]

Rep Miller, Jeff [FL-1]

Rep Myrick, Sue [NC-9]

Rep Neugebauer, Randy [TX-19]

Rep Ney, Robert W. [OH-18]

Rep Northup, Anne [KY-3]

Rep Norwood, Charlie [GA-9]

Rep Nussle, Jim [IA-1]

Rep Osborne, Tom [NE-3]

Rep Oxley, Michael G. [OH-4]

Rep Pearce, Stevan [NM-2]

Rep Pence, Mike [IN-6]

Rep Peterson, Collin C. [MN-7]

Rep Peterson, John E. [PA-5]

Rep Pickering, Charles W. (Chip) [MS-3]

Rep Pitts, Joseph R. [PA-16]

Rep Pombo, Richard W. [CA-11]

Rep Putnam, Adam H. [FL-12]

Rep Radanovich, George P. [CA-19]

Rep Rogers, Harold [KY-5]

Rep Rogers, Mike D. [AL-3]

Rep Rohrabacher, Dana [CA-46]

Rep Ryun, Jim [KS-2]

Rep Sandlin, Max [TX-1]

Rep Schrock, Edward L. [VA-2]

Rep Sessions, Pete [TX-32]

Rep Shadegg, John B. [AZ-3]

Rep Shuster, Bill [PA-9]

Rep Smith, Christopher H. [NJ-4]

Rep Smith, Lamar [TX-21]

Rep Souder, Mark E. [IN-3]

Rep Stearns, Cliff [FL-6]

Rep Stenholm, Charles W. [TX-17]

Rep Sullivan, John [OK-1]

Rep Tancredo, Thomas G. [CO-6]

Rep Tauzin, W. J. (Billy) [LA-3]

Rep Taylor, Charles H. [NC-11]

Rep Taylor, Gene [MS-4]

Rep Tiahrt, Todd [KS-4]

Rep Toomey, Patrick J. [PA-15]

Rep Turner, Michael R. [OH-3]

Rep Vitter, David [LA-1]

Rep Wamp, Zach [TN-3]

Rep Weldon, Dave [FL-15]

Rep Whitfield, Ed [KY-1]

Rep Wicker, Roger F. [MS-1]

Rep Wilson, Joe [SC-2]

Rep Wolf, Frank R. [VA-10]

107-107

© 2019 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

   
1Like our page
2Share
Pre-2008
"The future we will pass on to our children may well ride on the outcome of this vote. I am convinced that, unless we pass a constitutional amendment defining marriage in the United States as the union of a man and a woman, the U.S. Supreme Court in just a few years will...
Defend,Marriage,Now!
1058
2004-00-29
Wednesday, 29 September 2004 12:00 AM
Newsmax Media, Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved