Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - In Google Play
Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - On the App Store
Skip to main content

Wall Street Titans Outearned by Media Czars: William D. Cohan

Sunday, 27 May 2012 06:54 PM EDT

Think Wall Street is the land of plenty when it comes to compensation? Think again. If 2011 pay to top executives is a window into the Wall Street compensation machine, then compared with other industries -- the entertainment media, for instance -- the bloom is definitely off the rose.

In 2011, the best-paid Wall Street chief executive officer was Jamie Dimon at JPMorgan Chase & Co. He got $23 million in total compensation. John Stumpf of Wells Fargo & Co. got $17.9 million, while Lloyd Blankfein at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. had to settle for $16.2 million. Although Vikram Pandit at Citigroup Inc. received $14.9 million, 55 percent of Citigroup’s shareholders voted for a nonbinding resolution that would have denied him that pay. James Gorman at Morgan Stanley took home $10.5 million, a pay cut of 25 percent from the previous year. Brian Moynihan at Bank of America Corp. got $8.1 million.

I understand that this is a great deal of money. And that it remains true that Wall Street firms pay out a larger percentage of their annual revenue as compensation to employees than any other industry where companies are publicly traded -- generally between 40 percent and 50 percent, although Lazard Ltd. has been averaging a payout ratio of 63 percent of revenue for the past two years. Yet there is a clear pattern: Absolute levels of Wall Street pay, in relation to some other fields, have been coming down in recent years.

A Sea Change

There are good reasons for this, of course. Generally, profits have been down, return on equity is down, revenue growth is down, stock prices are down and regulation is up. And the prospects for finding ways out of this conundrum are minimal. While few tears will be shed for Wall Street’s executives, or for anyone else fortunate enough to work there -- after all, where else can so much money be made without having to put in any of your own capital? -- these trends may bring a sea change at the big banks.

For more than a generation, Wall Street has been able to recruit the world’s best and brightest mostly by promising them more money than they can possibly make elsewhere. Indeed it is the rare Wall Street employee, especially among those just starting out, who admit to being motivated by anything other than the fat paychecks they have been promised. But when that promise can no longer be kept, or when paychecks are smaller than expected, the best and the brightest begin voting with their feet.

Where do they go? Well if the theorem is true that they follow the money, then there should be a stampede back into professions such as the media industry, where top executives quietly hauled down a fortune in 2011 compensation. For instance, Les Moonves, the CEO of CBS Corp., was paid $69.9 million in 2011. David Zaslav of Discovery Communications Inc. received $52.4 million, while Philippe Dauman at Viacom Inc. was paid $43 million. Walt Disney Co.’s Robert Iger got $31 million. Jeff Bewkes, at Time Warner Inc., was paid $26 million in 2011.

Even the top executives at Comcast Corp., Brian Roberts and Steve Burke, received compensation of $27 million and $24 million, respectively, despite their pay being cut 13 percent and 32 percent, respectively, from the previous year. (It’s worth noting that Comcast patriarch Ralph Roberts, now 92 years old and still a regular in the executive offices at the company, once again took $1 in compensation for 2011.)

Six media executives wound up in the top 15 of the Associated Press’s list of highest-paid executives released last week; not a single banker joined them. No doubt these talented executives are worth every penny of their exorbitant pay: Profits at their companies are up, as are stock prices. But one would be hard-pressed to remember the last time that the top pay at media companies outstripped that of Wall Street.

This apparent paradigm shift occurs infrequently, and could well signal the beginning of a new era -- the first in generations -- when the pay potential is no longer highest on Wall Street. When you combine that with just how miserable it is to work at one of those banks on a day-to-day basis, there may be value for the leaders of Wall Street to rethink not only their business models but also what they will need to do to continue to attract the best and the brightest when offering the highest pay is no longer an option.

(William D. Cohan, a former investment banker and the author of “Money and Power: How Goldman Sachs Came to Rule the World,” is a Bloomberg View columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)

© Copyright 2023 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.

Sunday, 27 May 2012 06:54 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.
Join the Newsmax Community
Read and Post Comments
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the NewsmaxTV App
Get the NewsmaxTV App for iOS Get the NewsmaxTV App for Android Scan QR code to get the NewsmaxTV App
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved