Tags: Donald Trump | Immigration | Middle East | Supreme Court | Syria | Venezuela | War on Terrorism

To Thwart Trump, Left Plays Flimsy Race Card

To Thwart Trump, Left Plays Flimsy Race Card

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts (left) and Associate Justice Stephen Breyer listen to President Donald Trump's first State of the Union address Jan. 30. (Win McNamee/AP)

By
Thursday, 28 June 2018 03:47 PM Current | Bio | Archive

When the U.S. Supreme Court decided Tuesday to endorse the president's so-called "Muslim ban," the left's knee-jerk response was typically predictable, pathetic, and phony: "Trump is a racist!"

"By upholding the Muslim ban, the United States Supreme Court has sided with a racist and xenophobic attack on Muslims and immigrants," roared Johanna Calle, director of New Jersey Alliance for Immigrant Justice. "Banning travelers and refugees from Muslim-majority countries has been a part of the Trump administration’s policies against immigrant communities from the beginning."

The court's 5-4 ruling, Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., told NBC News, "gives legitimacy to discrimination and Islamophobia."

Senate Democratic whip Dick Durbin of Illinois told CNN "the net result of" this policy "sadly was to suggest that when it came to countries with large Muslim populations, they weren't welcome in the United States."

Despite the left's now yawn-inducing screams of "racism," this policy has nothing to do with Islamophobia. And it never did. It concerns U.S. national security and counter-terrorism.

A genuine, hate-fueled Muslim ban would include all or most of Earth's 51 majority-Muslim nations. In fact, a grand total of five majority-Muslim countries are restricted: Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen.

The travel limit also includes North Korea, an officially atheist state with a pre-Communist history steeped in Confucianism, not Islam. Certain Venezuelan travelers also are proscribed. Like North Korea, Venezuela is neither Middle Eastern nor predominantly Islamic. Pew Research reports it is approximately 73 percent Catholic and 17 percent Protestant. Venezuela is 0.3 percent Muslim.

North Korea's and Venezuela's involvement in the "Muslim-ban" suggests one of two things. Either President Trump hates Confucian-infused atheists and Catholics almost as much as he loathes Muslims, or, once again, these travel restrictions have nothing to do with Islam and everything to do with shielding the U.S. from the citizens of terrorist-infested countries who cannot or will not help U.S. officials vet their own nationals wanting to enter America.

John Roberts's majority opinion vanquishes the left's "anti-Muslim bigotry" narrative.

Trump's "policy covers just 8 percent of the world's Muslim population," the chief justice observed.

A truly Islamophobic reform surely would try harder. Neither Indonesia nor Pakistan is on this list. To detest Muslims yet exclude Islam's two most populous countries is as absurd as hating Francophones and consequently restricting travelers from Haiti and Togo but welcoming Frenchmen and Canadians.

Roberts added "three Muslim-majority countries — Iraq, Sudan, and Chad — have been removed from the list of covered countries." Indeed, they were unbanned after harmonizing their safety protocols with Washington's. Last April, for instance, the White House announced "the Republic of Chad has improved its identity-management and information sharing practices sufficiently to meet the baseline security standard of the United States. Chad nationals will therefore again be able to receive visas for travel to the United States."

This hardly smacks of anti-Muslim hate.

Roberts also recalled "The entry restrictions on Muslim-majority nations are limited to countries that were previously designated by Congress or prior administrations as posing national security risks."

Such prior administrations include Obama's, which selected seven majority-Islamic nations for heightened vigilance: Initially Iran, Iraq, Sudan, and Syria. Two months later, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen were added.

Individuals who traveled from or through these "countries of concern," as they are known officially, have experienced increased scrutiny since December 2015. Donald J. Trump was not president back then. In fact, as anti-Trump CNN reported Jan. 30, 2017, "The seven Muslim-majority countries targeted in President Trump's executive order on immigration were initially identified as 'countries of concern' under the Obama administration."(Emphasis added.)

By the left's logic, compiling this list of "countries of concern" would make Barack Hussein Obama an anti-Muslim bigot.

Once again, the fact the left went from zero to racism in just 10 seconds after Tuesday's Supreme Court decision confirms the Democratic choir has just one hymn in its missal. How ugly. How sad.

Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News contributor and a contributing editor with National Review Online. He has been a media fellow with the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University. Read more opinions from Deroy Murdock — Click Here Now.

© 2020 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

   
1Like our page
2Share
Murdock
The left went from zero to racism in just 10 seconds after Tuesday's Supreme Court decision, confirming the Democratic choir has just one hymn in its missal. How ugly. How sad.
libya, muslim, sudan, travel ban, left, liberal hysteria, race card
692
2018-47-28
Thursday, 28 June 2018 03:47 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved