Tags: harry | elizabeth | franco | prince

Are Monarchies Still Relevant?

queen elizabeth ii

Queen Elizabeth II smiles as she arrives before the Opening of the Flanders' Fields Memorial Garden at Wellington Barracks on Nov. 6, 2014 in London, England. (Stefan Wermuth - WPA Pool /Getty Images)

By Wednesday, 10 March 2021 03:11 PM Current | Bio | Archive

In an era of unlimited media exposure, royal families from Europe, and elsewhere globally, never fail to provide fuel for explosive scandals.

During times of global distress, the dramas of the monarchies provide the perfect escape for many, as soaring broadcast media ratings show.

The accusation of racism within the British Royal Family in a widely publicized interview with prince Harry and his wife, with Oprah Winfrey on CBS, is the most recent controversy to splash onto the scene and blot out the other monarchies around the world.

Beyond the salacious details of such media frenzies, it's worthwhile to examine the significant role that royalty should contribute to stabilizing society.

Despite the sensational allegations against Buckingham Palace over the years, there is no institution more stable in Great Britain than its monarchy.

Presumably, thanks to the charismatic white-haired woman who has represented the Crown for so many years, the Crown still stands on its own.

Every man, woman, boy, and girl associated with the British Crown, whether in the UK, Canada, Australia or New Zealand, holds a special view of Queen Elizabeth.

The scandals of other royal families have also hit the headlines recently — investigations of corruption in the neighboring palaces in Belgium and Spain, massive street protests against laws prohibiting the insult of the King of Thailand, in the Mideast; and now, a Saudi prince faces serious accusations of ordering the murder of Journalist Jamal Khashoggi in Turkey.

Certainly, there are problems in every royal house in the world.

Kings are not angels, and they should be held accountable for wrongdoings to the general public. But the media's brand of yellow journalism will not change the face of history, no matter how many sordid details they themselves whip-up — and empower.

Reporters stack scandal upon scandal for the sole purpose of climbing to a height where money and publicity can be gleaned.

Thus, there is no sincere attempt to correct distortion, but only a simple intention to profit from the dirty circuses they promote.

Being a king or prince is truly an assignment in the public arena.

They are responsible for going out to greet schools, to attend assemblies, and national ceremonies.

They act as a state symbol of the people.

Similar to the kingdom of the upper nature, the kingdom of heaven, the dynasties of kings on earth are a permanent, stable, and unchanging factor which runs like a thread connecting periods of time and generations.

A kingdom is like a material branch stemming from a spiritual root.

In the same way a hierarchy in nature prevails, a royal monarchy can furnish a suitable form of government in human society.

If all European countries today were ruled by kings instead of politicians, Europe would not be at a brink of collapse as it is now.

Regardless of political upheavals between states and within the countries, the royal houses themselves remain connected to one another, maintaining relationships above all the other frictions.

And here lies their importance also in a modern world.

The royal houses form a kind of symbolic safety net in the connections between them that portrays balance and stability for the European continent that marches on a thin rope.

Perceptive statesmen also understand this important function of royalty.

Even Francisco Franco, ruler of a repressive military dictatorship in Spain, after all was said and done, declared Juan Carlos as king, because he understood how the monarchy can work as a stabilizing force.

What we see in the scandals before our eyes is not the collapse of the royal houses, not the end of an era as it is presented to be.

On the contrary, they have great potential to help Europe be more stable.

It would be a benefit to the world if all the remaining royal houses, even the smallest ones, were preserved.

Kings and queens are in a position to provide hope and examples of how to withstand the rising tide of the stormy modern seas.

I expect the royal houses to succeed in these challenging times and rise in importance as the rulers of the present world descend.

Because unlike the world leaders who rule today — those who are elected for a few years and do not mind leaving ruin at the end of their term — kings know that from the day they are born until the day they die, they are responsible for the state.

Therefore, they should step up efforts to care for and connect to the people.

At the end of the day, this is their mission, this is what hierarchy was established for, to be at the service of the masses to help ensure steady and strong societies.

Michael Laitman is a global thinker living in Israel with a Ph.D. in Philosophy and Kabbalah and an MS in Medical Bio-Cybernetics. He has published more than 40 books. Laitman believes that only through unity and connection can we solve our problems, creating a better world for our children. Visit www.MichaelLaitman.com for more info. Read Michael Laitman's Reports — More Here.

© 2021 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


MichaelLaitman
At the end of the day, this is their mission, this is what hierarchy was established for, to be at the service of the masses to help ensure steady and strong societies.
harry, elizabeth, franco, prince
839
2021-11-10
Wednesday, 10 March 2021 03:11 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved