There seems to be a cottage industry developing around the White House Press Secretary, Jen Psaki, and her gaffes and mischaracterizations.
For example, when asked about the Biden administration's support for the new military branch, the United States Space Force, Psaki was caught off guard.
A reporter asked about the Biden administration's commitment to keeping Space Force, and she responded, "Wow. Space Force. It's the plane of today."
The reporter pushed back, and Psaki continued by saying, "It is an interesting question. I am happy to check with our Space Force point of contact. I'm not sure who that is. I will find out and see if we have any update on that."
House Armed Services ranking member Mike Rogers was blunt when he remarked, "It's concerning to see the Biden administration's press secretary blatantly diminish an entire branch of our military as the punchline of a joke, which I'm sure China would find funny," Psaki later walked the comment back.
The White House confirmed their "full support" for Space Force.
However, most analysts agree that space-national security is not a top priority of this administration.
As one of the presenters and authors of Space Command's, The Future of Space 2060, it is incumbent on those enmeshed in space strategy to comment during this genesis period for the new U.S. Space Force.
Space Force is under siege by various factions with drastically different ideologies, ranging from left-wing secular progressives that believe Space Force will militarize an already militarized space to libertarians who believe that it is a colossal waste of money.
These two vastly different groups share two traits: firstly, they want to characterize Space Force as a "Trump vanity project."
Secondly, they have zero understanding of the strategic precipice America is walking on. Thus, these groups focus on cosmetic attacks because they are entirely out of their depth on strategy.
They make fun of the uniforms, the name "guardians," the use of the delta insignia (which pre-dates Star Trek), and the general absurdity via a Netflix series.
A review of the fundamental issues is in order. There were long-standing debates about the need for a military space branch. Ultimately, these debates distilled down to arguments over the concepts of "Guard," "Corps," and "Force."
The third idea, a Space Force, would be an independent branch after transitioning from the U.S. Air Force.
These debates were held among space and military professionals in niche areas and did not include the broader national security elite or the electorate. This is one reason why the extremists have controlled the narrative and may offer cover to those in the new administration that want to stall Space Force rather than eliminate an already existing institution.
In an interview with the NYT on March 8th, General Raymond, U.S. Space Force Chief of Space Operations, summarized the new branch's importance: "I think it's really important for the average American to understand access to space and freedom to maneuver in space is a vital interest."
The benefit to the American people protected by our Space Force Guardians is immeasurable. Any professional looking at the future of American national security realizes that this security will depend on which power exercises military primacy and space governance.
Thus, there will no longer be a separation between what we call national security and space strategy, to be precise. They will literally and figuratively be the same. Let that sink into any reader as one evaluates the need for the U.S. Space Force. The benefits and threats from space will dwarf those on Earth.
All of those benefits and threats on Earth will ultimately be decided by space strategy.
The mightiest Carrier Task Force, tank platoon, or bomb squadron will be utterly vulnerable to space-based threats just as the medieval fortress became almost useless versus mobile artillery and, later on, warplanes.
China and Russia are embarked on complimentary space policies to beat us in space. They already have their versions of a militarized space branch, and more importantly, space dominance doctrines that are specifically designed to dethrone the United States from its military and economic position.
Thus, a newsflash for opponents or those that mock Space Force is this: space was militarized long ago and continues to be militarized. Russia and China fully intend to amplify this regardless of American efforts, including diplomacy and or negotiations.
The coming economic revolution, the revolution of "New Space," the revolution of the "triplanetary economy," will unleash economic forces and powers that will extend economies and resources beyond anything in human history. This econosphere will either be protected by Space Force or left to be exploited by America's adversaries.
The new space economy will need to be protected, communication will need to be managed, travel and spacecraft control maintained, and debris will need to be cleared. No economic system can exist without the protection of the law, private property, contracts, and protection from hostility, violence, chaos, and criminality.
The future of WMD defense, cyber defense, energy production, environmental protection, and democratic values will be entirely dependent on American space strategy.
The creation and success of Space Force now signal to America's adversaries the seriousness in which we take American security beyond rhetoric.
The Space Force is the foundation to build this security for the future.
Dr. Lamont Colucci has experience as a diplomat with the U.S. Dept. of State and is today a Full Professor of Politics and Government at Ripon College. Find out more at lamontcolucci.org. Read Dr. Lamont Colucci's Reports — More Here.
© 2022 Newsmax. All rights reserved.