Tags: Putin | punk | band | hooliganism

Russian Punk Band Is Not the Victim

Monday, 20 August 2012 08:33 PM

This week, a Russian court sentenced three feminist punk performers to prison for two years. The three women were charged with "hooliganism." 

The graveness of the charge was described by The New York Times on Aug. 18: "The case began in February when the women infiltrated the Cathedral of Christ the Savior wearing colorful balaclavas, and pranced around in front of the golden Holy Doors leading to the altar, dancing, chanting and lip-syncing for what would later become a music video of a profane song in which they beseeched the Virgin Mary to rid Russia of Mr. Putin."

russian-punk-band-rally-in-ny-getty.jpg
Ellina Graypel (right) sings with supporters of the Russian punk-rock group during a rally in Times Square.
(Getty Images)
The Cathedral of Christ the Savior in Moscow had been deliberately destroyed by Stalin. It was rebuilt in 1992 after the fall of the Soviet Union under Mikhail Gorbachev, and is one of Moscow's architectural gems and now once again heavily used by the Russian Orthodox church. 

The Times reported on the Russian Orthodox Church's reaction: "On Friday, the Russian Orthodox Church issued a statement that referred to Nazi aggression and the militant atheism of the Soviet era, and said, 'What happened is blasphemy and sacrilege, the conscious and deliberate insult to the sanctuary and a manifestation of hostility to millions of people.'"

In delivering her sentence, Judge Syrova found that the action in the church was "motivated by religious hatred," according to the Times.

The Western cultural elite is rallying to the defense of the disrupters in the cathedral.

Some approve of the verbal attack on Putin. Others support the denunciation of the Russian Orthodox Church leadership and the church disruption because of the church leadership support of Putin. All cited characterize the issue as one of free speech.

I do not.

I would assume that many of the band’s supporters would take a different position, and rightly so, if here in the U.S. a black church were invaded and three men or women engaged in comparable conduct insulting holy places within the church and the pastor.

When I was mayor in 1989 and the AIDS activist group Act Up — unjustifiably angry with John Cardinal O'Connor — invaded St. Patrick's Cathedral and interrupted mass, throwing communion wafers — which for Catholics are the actual Body of Christ — to the floor. 

Some were arrested. 

As far as I can recall, no one was punished. But I think the decision of the Russian court to punish a hate crime was just and something to be applauded rather than condemned and ridiculed. 

One can argue concerning the degree of punishment, whether fines rather than jail time should have been imposed, but that is a function of the Russian penalty procedures. 

I also believe it is not in the interest of the U.S. to support the actions of the band. At a time when the Iranian nuclear threat grows by the day and we are fighting Islamic extremists around the world, we should be seeking to enlist President Putin to join the West in our effort to prevent the Islamist fanatics from achieving their goal of destroying Western civilization, not making him the enemy and this band the victim.

The attacks on President Putin for "squelching free speech" included one by Madonna performing at the time in Moscow. The singer reportedly performed in a black bra with the name of the band stenciled in bold letters on her back.

Madonna is an artist, always testing the limits of decency and often going beyond restrictions accepted by ordinary people. I do not, however, defer to her judgment on such political matters.

Most shocking to me was the response of the White House, as reported by the Times: "In Washington, where Obama administration officials followed the trial closely, seeing it as a measure of Mr. Putin's new presidency and its own troubled relations with Russia, the White House and the State Department each criticized the verdict. The State Department all but called on Russia's higher courts to overturn the conviction and 'ensure that the right to freedom of expression is upheld.' A White House spokesman, Tommy Vietor, said the verdict was disappointing and the sentences disproportionate. 'While we understand that the group's behavior was offensive to some, we have serious concerns about the way these young women have been treated by the Russian judicial system,' he said."

Offensive to some?

I do not believe the issue is properly one of freedom of expression.

The right to free expression is not unlimited and does not mean one can say anything anywhere and at anytime.

Further, Russia and most countries do not have embedded in their law the constitutional protection of the First Amendment that we do.

I for one am delighted they now punish religious hatred. Aren't you?

Edward Koch was the 105th mayor of New York City for three terms, from 1978 to 1989. He previously served for nine years as a congressman. Read more reports from Ed Koch — Click Here Now.

© 2019 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

   
1Like our page
2Share
833
2012-33-20
Monday, 20 August 2012 08:33 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved