×
Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - In Google Play
VIEW
×
Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - On the App Store
VIEW
Skip to main content
Tags: Jeb Bush | Mitt Romney | 2016 Elections
OPINION

Jeb Faces a Snag Romney Faced

John Stoehr By Thursday, 18 December 2014 08:35 AM EST Current | Bio | Archive

Does Jeb Bush have a Mitt Romney problem? That was the question leading up to the former Florida governor's soft announcement this week that he was exploring a run for the presidency in 2016. The question came from Bloomberg reporters Joshua Green and Miles Weiss, who on Dec. 11 wrote about Bush's new and intricately entangled financial dealings with private equity funds that, among other things, help foreign and domestic investors avoid paying U.S. taxes.

Green and Weiss argue that with these ventures, revealed by Nov. 27 filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Jeb Bush shares "a number of liabilities with the last nominee, Mitt Romney, whose career in private equity proved so politically damaging that it sunk his candidacy."

If Bush does indeed share such liabilities, he was sharing them long before this year.
In July, Lou Dubose reported on Bush's role as spokesman for a Miami firm that bilked millions from investors, and whose founder, Claudio Osorio is now serving time in federal prison. Osorio was a known fraud before Bush came on board, and Bush stayed on board even as Osorio was under investigation.

As Dubose wrote in The Washington Spectator, the evidence suggests at least "an ethical blind spot that led Bush to ignore the fact that the book value and returns reported by InnoVida executives were impossible under any reasonable set of financial assumptions.  . . .  Bush endorsed a company that defrauded its shareholders and the government while failing to deliver its product to market."

But there's reason to believe Bush does not have a Romney problem. Not in the way we currently think. Business is a natural part of the Bush family experience. Business and politics go hand to such a degree that there's no distinction between them. As Jeb noted on his announcement, he had a great time over the Thanksgiving weekend, watched a lot of football with the people he loves and they all talked about the future of the country.

I suspect voters, especially Republican voters, don't mind Jeb Bush's business history. Even if they are fodder for attack ads. That history is easily overshadowed by his coming from a long line of venerated public servants all the way back to Prescott Bush of Connecticut — who was a wealthy and well-connected banker and a U.S. senator.

In contrast, Republican Mitt Romney was a one-term governor of the most liberal state in America who made millions almost exclusively through a private-equity firm that cannibalized other firms. Sure, former Republican Governor George Romney of Michigan was Willard Mitt Romney's dad, but old George was a civil-rights warrior and a liberal beloved by the likes of Nelson Rockefeller. In other words, long before Mitt Romney ran for president, he was persona non grata among movement conservatives.

Which I think is the proper context in which to compare Jeb Bush to Mitt Romney — not a context of labyrinthine financial deal-making, but of the various (and sometimes competing) factions that make claims to conservatism, especially the ascendent libertarian faction from which anti-abortion conservatives and neoconservatives have kept a distance.

As Sean Trende reminded us some time ago, the Republican base — and he means specifically those who aligned themselves under the banner of the Tea Party — is furious with the GOP establishment especially over what it sees as the betrayal of the George W. Bush years in which the biggest Republican majority since the 1920s was squandered on attempts at immigration reform, bank bailouts and the biggest single act of nation-building — Iraq —since the launch of the Marshall Plan.

He writes, "The icing on the cake for conservatives is that these moves were justified through an argument that they were necessary to continue to win elections and take issues off the table for Democrats. Instead, Bush’s presidency was followed in 2008 by the most liberal Democratic presidency since Lyndon Johnson, accompanied by sizable Democratic House and Senate majorities."

So the Bush brand is far from robust. And this just the start.

John Stoehr is the managing editor of The Washington Spectator, a national bulletin of news and public affairs. He has written for Newsweek, The American Conservative, The American Prospect, Columbia Journalism Review, the New Statesman, CNN, and the Los Angeles Review of Books, among many others. For more of his reports, Go Here Now.
 



© 2023 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


JohnStoehr
There's reason to believe Bush does not have a Romney problem. Not in the way we currently think. Business is a natural part of the Bush family experience. Business and politics go hand to such a degree that there's no distinction between them.
Jeb Bush, Mitt Romney, 2016 Elections
721
2014-35-18
Thursday, 18 December 2014 08:35 AM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.
Join the Newsmax Community
Read and Post Comments
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
 
TOP

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the NewsmaxTV App
Get the NewsmaxTV App for iOS Get the NewsmaxTV App for Android Scan QR code to get the NewsmaxTV App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved