Tags: obama | clinton | democratic party

Obama-Clinton Goal Was to Create a Permanent Democratic Majority

Obama-Clinton Goal Was to Create a Permanent Democratic Majority
Former president Barack Obama speaks to a gathering of more than 50 mayors and other guests during the North American Climate Summit on December 5, 2017, in Chicago, Illinois. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

By
Monday, 12 February 2018 11:37 AM Current | Bio | Archive

What was the real goal of the Obama-Clinton Democratic political machine? Was it merely to win the election of 2016?

What these leftists were attempting was more ambitious than winning an election. The evidence suggests the Obama-Clinton Democratic machine’s goal was no less than a permanent dominant single political party: a transformation eliminating all challenges to their dominance; and as a corollary, the powerful inner circle would be the Obama-Clinton machine, this axis would have controlled America.

The Obama-Clinton-Democrat takeover of America involves two major initiatives: societal and governmental.

The societal initiatives included:

1. Infiltrating the important non-governmental institutions of society with Clinton-Obama supporters. For example, the Catholic Church leadership opposed a portion of the Obama policies. Hillary’s response was: we need to put our own people in the leadership positions of the church. Other examples of this infiltration, while not so deliberate, are the near total domination by Democrats of mass communication and the education system.

2. Weaken nongovernmental institutions or drive them out of existence. For example, private charitable organizations are competition for a government aspiring to be the people’s savior and protector. The left opposes permitting the private sector to do almost anything that can be taken over by government.

3. The threat and actual use of intimidating violence in the streets by organizations that burn and pillage and injure.

4. Operating a shadow organization 365 days a year to keep the pressure on society and government. The Clinton Foundation closely fits this model. The Foundation employees were still on the Clinton payroll while holding offices in the government.

The governmental initiatives include:

1. Government offices, historically neutral, become aggressive forceful agents that can infiltrate all aspects of society and suppress any opposition.

2. Using government to surveille everyone, gathering information that could be used against anyone who opposes the leaders. The hit film, "The Lives of Others" (2006) about the East German secret police, provides an understanding of the pernicious impact of surveillance.

3. Control the election process. Opposition is suppressed and abused with a two pronged approach: (i) use government to curb the activities of opposition, and (ii) flood the nation with immigrants, legal and illegal, who are believed to be likely Democratic voters.

4. Unfortunately a case can be made to explain the light touch of the Democratic axis even to deal with terrorists entering the United States. The more terrorists, the larger the number of government employees required to shadow and monitor the terrorists — thus a growth in government, and there is the added bonus of a massive, unchallengeable need for surveillance.

Had Hillary won the 2016 election, Republicans would have had no chance to win a future election. What Obama, Hillary and the Democrats were creating was a totalitarian mass movement and a totalitarian party (remember Hillary had control of the Democratic Party) that ultimately would have resulted in a totalitarian rule. What the Obama-Hillary Axis was doing resembles the information in William Kornhauser’s classic book, "The Politics of Mass Society," in which he considers the transitions of a free society to a totalitarian one.

America would have been well on its way to losing many fundamental freedoms and it would have been the end of the free society that has been the envy of most of the world (except for many Democrats who choose to trash America).

Whether Hillary and the Democrats fully understood the implications of what they were seeking to do is beside the point, because this is where it was going to end up.

What remains scary about the Democratic ambitions is that they still believe they can pull it off. The part of their plan to expand the voter rolls through legal and illegal immigration is still possible. If they can create a voting majority and gain control of the government, then once again they can use the government to suppress freedom and the opposition.

The Democrats even now in 2018 demand and bargain at every turn to grant illegal immigrants voting rights and citizenship, and they oppose measures to prevent dangerous immigrants from entering the nation. They oppose support of the military, and thus American security, unless concessions are made for their Democratic schemes. Anyone still in doubt about the Democratic ambitions should consider the continuing Democratic lies, cover-up, and suppression of truth. Americans should be frightened of this behavior.

The Obama-Clinton Axis nearly succeeded to create a permanent one party dominant system. A one party system, always in control, that would effectively transform America to a banana republic with no individual freedom. People would not even be allowed to choose the size of their soft drink. This Axis desired a full subversion of the United States Constitution and the most precious commodity of America: freedom.

John Havick has a Ph.D. in political science. He was a professor at Georgia Institute of Technology for many years, authored several books and a number of articles, including the widely cited "The Impact of the Internet on a Television-Based Society." His work has appeared in The New York Times, and his recent book, "The Ghosts of NASCAR: The Harlan Boys and the First Daytona 500," is available at ghostsofnascar.com. For more of his reports, Go Here Now.

© 2019 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

   
1Like our page
2Share
JohnHavick
What was the real goal of the Obama-Clinton Democratic political machine? Was it merely to win the election of 2016?
obama, clinton, democratic party
869
2018-37-12
Monday, 12 February 2018 11:37 AM
Newsmax Media, Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved