Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - In Google Play
Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - On the App Store
Skip to main content
Tags: harris | graham | nixon | reagan

Losing Presidential Candidates Offer a Winning Lesson

the third democratic debate in houston texas in september of last year

The Democratic presidential candidates, during the third debate in Houston, Texas on Sept. 12, 2019. 
(Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Ira Stoll By Tuesday, 21 January 2020 03:36 PM EST Current | Bio | Archive

On the Sunday of Martin Luther King Day weekend I ran into New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio. He was in the checkout line of a New Balance factory outlet store in Brighton, Massachusetts — alone.

It was a reminder of how quickly the spotlight shifts away from politicians.

Six months ago, de Blasio was debating Joe Biden in prime time on national television.

If he wasn’t exactly drawing huge crowds on his campaign visits to Iowa and New Hampshire, well, at least he was followed by a pack of reporters and an entourage of aides.

His failure to generate huge crowds wound up being the topic of news articles read by many.

Now de Blasio, while remaining the mayor of America’s largest city, has joined the long list of presidential candidates who did not win the presidency.

It’s a distinguished group, but it’s not a club that it’s anyone’s first choice to join.

What are the options for a former presidential candidate?

There’s the radio and television personality route chosen by Mike Huckabee, a former governor of Arkansas who ran for president as a Republican in 2008 and 2016.

There’s the possibility of serving in the cabinet; President Trump named his former opponents Rick Perry as energy secretary and Ben Carson as secretary of housing and urban development. John Kerry got to serve as secretary of state after failing as a Democratic presidential candidate in 2004.

The U.S. Senate is always a fallback; Mitt Romney, R-Utah is there, along with Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Kamala Harris, D-Calif., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.

Walter Mondale served as ambassador to Japan during the Clinton administration after running unsuccessfully against President Reagan in 1984.

Robert Dole and Richard Gephardt became lobbyists. Michael Dukakis became a college professor; Robert Kerrey, a senator from Nebraska who ran for president in 1992, became a university president.

What all these things have in common is that they are considerably less significant than being president of the United States.

If the Democratic presidential candidates are driving you crazy — not in a "how will I ever pick between all of these great choices," sort of way, but in a "really, this is the best they can come up with?" sort of way, it may be some consolation that before long, most of these characters will be back in the relative obscurity in which they belong.

For the candidates, that may be mentally tough; going through life with the label "losing presidential candidate" is not exactly an ego-booster. Some of them may console themselves with the knowledge that "losing presidential candidate" was a label also belonging to Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Richard Nixon — before they earned the label of "winning presidential candidate," also known as "president."

The "losing presidential candidate" label can also translate into the title of vice president, as Joe Biden can attest.

Even for those who don’t eventually parlay the losing presidential candidate role into the position of president or vice president, there are worse titles to have. It's probably a better title to go through life with than "politician who never had the confidence or ambition to run for president at all."

The losers sometimes lose for reasons outside their control. It doesn’t necessarily mean they wouldn’t have made good presidents, or that their ideas lack value.

Their presence in the race helps sharpen the skills of the winners and helps the rest of us voters think through the options.

Participation trophies get a bad rap from pundits worried that America is celebrating mediocrity rather than excellence. I thought de Blasio’s proposed 70% federal income tax would be ruinous and once described him as a "pro-Sandinista tax-the-rich type."

But as we head into a primary and caucus season and election year that celebrates winners, let us pause to thank the losers, too. De Blasio, Beto O’Rourke, Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, Julian Castro — at least part of their motive for risking the humiliation of loss must have been that they cared about America enough to try to improve it.

The big trophies in life get handed out, justifiably, on results, not intentions.

But the democracy runs on people caring enough to get involved. On that front, the losing candidates set an example. There’s disappointment there but also some inspiration.

Ira Stoll is author of "J.F.K. Conservative," and "Samuel Adams: A Life." Read more reports from Ira Stoll — Click Here Now

© 2023 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Democracy runs on people caring enough to get involved. On that front, the losing candidates set an example. There’s disappointment there but also some inspiration.
harris, graham, nixon, reagan
Tuesday, 21 January 2020 03:36 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.
Join the Newsmax Community
Read and Post Comments
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the NewsmaxTV App
Get the NewsmaxTV App for iOS Get the NewsmaxTV App for Android Scan QR code to get the NewsmaxTV App
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved