Tags: Economic- Crisis | chris | Christie | Jon | Corzine | tom | corbett

Chris Christie for President

By
Tuesday, 12 Oct 2010 08:54 AM Current | Bio | Archive

Day and night, black and white, right and wrong. All describe what New Jersey is versus what it was. The difference? Simple. It’s Chris Christie versus Jon Corzine.

One presided over a legacy of abject failure, driving the state into near bankruptcy, while the other is winning the day.

In taking on once-untouchable sacred cows, Gov. Christie has redefined political leadership while reigniting faith in citizens not just in the Garden State, but around the nation. Common sense, conviction, and consistency are the hallmarks of the hard-charging former U.S. attorney.

Agree with him or not, Christie has tackled the most controversial issues without regard to political consequences.

As a result, Christie has been so successful that a mere 10 months after he was sworn in, he has rocketed to the short list of presidential contenders.

Not coincidentally, another law-and-order candidate is enjoying similar success — Pennsylvania attorney general and Republican gubernatorial candidate Tom Corbett (also a former U.S. attorney). With just three weeks until Election Day, Corbett’s lead remains in double digits.

A major reason? Corbett has charted a course totally contrary to the track record of outgoing Gov. Ed Rendell.

The core belief of Corzine and Rendell is that big government — not the people — know what is best. Time and again, the two governors championed huge tax increases, toll hikes, industry-killing regulations, and class warfare.

To them, the answer to every problem is the same: more spending.

They never understood that increased taxes on already-overburdened people has the opposite effect of raising revenue. Citizens and businesses vote with their feet, seeking more friendly locations.

Corzine’s tax-and-spend policies resulted in a mass exodus of taxpayers and revenue.

Despite the fact that New Jersey had the highest state and local taxes, the second highest business tax burden, and more property taxes per capita than any other state, Corzine proposed a $1 billion tax increase!

Meanwhile, the out-of-control unions continued to receive unrealistic salaries and pension plans that made even Wall Street blush with envy.

Corzine ignored the fact that the system was unsustainable, and proceeded to drive the state off a cliff. Which is why he’s out of a job. But with union leadership and special interests on notice that there’s a new sheriff in town, New Jersey is actually becoming, dare we say it, desirable.

The only difference between Rendell and Corzine is that Pennsylvania’s governor has had four more years to wreck his state.

From not signing a single budget on time to his relentless attempts to transfer money from the people to government coffers, Rendell has decimated the economy of the commonwealth.

At a time when Pennsylvania families are doing the responsible thing, tightening their belts, Rendell has consistently done the opposite.

Spending has increased a whopping 40 percent under him, yet, incomprehensibly, he continues to ignore the fact that revenues are declining.

Instead, he uses smoke-and-mirror tactics to balance the books when, in reality, the state is facing a budget deficit in excess of $5 billion.

Like $400 million from tolling Interstate 80, except that initiative never happened.

Like the $800 million raided from the special fund to alleviate exorbitant medical malpractice premiums. Except that the courts ruled it must be paid back.

With no more stimulus money, a looming pension bomb, and state obligations increasing eightfold over the next two years, Rendell’s solution to this fiscal Armageddon was to expand gambling, levy massive new taxes, and kill the only industry that can resurrect Pennsylvania — the vast Marcellus Shale natural gas fields — by hitting oil companies with a crushing extraction tax.

I had the opportunity to be with Corbett and Christie in Pennsylvania this week, and couldn’t help but marvel at the stark differences between them and Corzine and Rendell.

The prosecutors refuse to raise taxes, unabashedly advocate school choice, promise a continued crackdown on corruption, and resolve to dramatically slash spending and eliminate stifling regulations, regardless of the political fallout.

Most important, they staunchly support openness and accountability in government both seriously lacking in prior administrations.

In each state, Democrats outnumber Republicans by significant margins, yet both Corbett and Christie are winning the hearts and minds of a majority of people.

They believe government should serve the people, not the other way around.

President Christie, anyone?

Chris Freind is an independent columnist, television commentator, and investigative reporter who operates his own news bureau, FreindlyFireZone.com

© 2017 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

   
1Like our page
2Share
Freind
Day and night, black and white, right and wrong. All describe what New Jersey is versus what it was.The difference?Simple.It s Chris Christie versus Jon Corzine. One presided over a legacy of abject failure, driving the state into near bankruptcy, while the other is...
chris,Christie,Jon,Corzine,tom,corbett
727
2010-54-12
Tuesday, 12 Oct 2010 08:54 AM
Newsmax Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved