Tags: china | reagan | trade | policies | work

Chris Macke: China, Reagan Prove Interventionist Trade Policies Can Work

Chris Macke: China, Reagan Prove Interventionist Trade Policies Can Work
(Zhenya Fan/Dreamstime)

By    |   Friday, 13 April 2018 05:38 PM

After China joined the World Trade Organization in December 2001, the U.S. goods trading deficit with China increased more than four times in just 15 years.  It now stands at $375 billion.  The question isn’t whether something needs to change in U.S. trade policy, the question is what.  While some argue against any change in U.S. trade policy, the reality is that tariffs and other interventionist trade measures are widely utilized by countries around the globe and they can work. 

China places a 25% tariff on imported cars while the U.S. has a 2.5% tariff.   How has each country fared?  China is the number one producer of cars.   China produced more than 24 million cars in 2016, one-third of the world’s production and a 350% increase from its 2008 production levels.  The U.S.?  Production declined by more than a third from just over six million units in 1996 to just under four million units in 2016.  The U.S. now produces one-third less of what it used to produce while China now produces one-third of the world’s cars. 

Still think tariffs don’t work?  In 1965 the U.S. implemented a 25% tariff on light trucks.  What happened? From 1965 to 2015, commercial vehicle production in the U.S. increased more than 450% while passenger car production declined by half during the same period. 

Tariffs aren’t the only trade tool that has been proven effective.  In 1981 President Reagan instituted quotas on Japanese auto imports.  Today, Toyota, Honda and Nissan produce more than three million vehicles in the U.S. including the Toyota Corolla which is made in Mississippi. More than half of the vehicles they sell in the U.S. are produced in the U.S. with Honda producing more than 70% of the vehicles it sells in the U.S. at U.S. production facilities. 

Contrast these stats with the American automaker GM.  Remember the 25% vehicle tariff imposed by China on car imports?  To avoid those tariffs and access China’s market, GM is building its Buick Envision in China while the Cadillac CT-6 is also being produced in China…and exported into the U.S.  Tariffs impact production location decisions. 

Strategic tariffs and other trade tools, implemented gradually over time to allow manufacturers to reconfigure supply chains can be part of an effective trade policy.  The idea that tariffs and other trade tools are always losers is not supported by the facts.  Just ask Chinese government officials if they think they are losing or winning in the production of cars.  

While there is a common argument that tariffs shouldn’t be used because they are protectionist, this is a damaging argument which contributes to our rising trade deficits, including with China.  It is damaging because it is founded on the myth that all countries want free and open trade when the reality is that all countries are protectionist, all countries place gaining a trade advantage above the purity of free trade. \

Arguing against tariffs based on claims of protectionism is naïve when every other country in the world is protectionist and using tariffs, often higher than U.S. tariffs to gain a trade advantage.  It is time we stop using claims of protectionism to disqualify any changes to current trade policy when the reality is that all countries are protectionist.   

The real question for U.S. trade policy is not whether trade policy needs to be changed, but how best to change it and the role various strategic trade tools including tariffs and quotas can play in improving America’s net exports of goods and services.

Chris Macke is the founder of Solutionomics, a non-partisan platform dedicated to developing and disseminating solutions for creating a more dynamic American economy. He has 25 years of experience in the financial services industry, including advising the U.S. Federal Reserve by providing market updates and counsel around the potential impact of monetary policies. Macke earned a bachelor’s degree in political science from the University of Southern California and an MBA from the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University.

© 2019 Newsmax Finance. All rights reserved.

   
1Like our page
2Share
StreetTalk
The real question for U.S. trade policy is not whether trade policy needs to be changed, but how best to change it and the role various strategic trade tools including tariffs and quotas can play in improving America’s net exports of goods and services.
china, reagan, trade, policies, work
665
2018-38-13
Friday, 13 April 2018 05:38 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
MONEYNEWS.COM
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved