Tags: vets | health | care | hospitals

Let Vets Get Health Care in Civilian Hospitals

Image: Let Vets Get Health Care in Civilian Hospitals

(AP Images/David Goldman)

By
Thursday, 08 Sep 2016 07:25 AM Current | Bio | Archive

 

I disagree with pretty much everything Donald Trump has ever said.

But in calling for veterans to have more options on their doctors and hospitals, he’s got a point. Imagine, for example, the outrage if military veterans were able to receive subsidized health care at the clinic or hospital of their choosing, but were then forced into a separate system of run-down, inconveniently located facilities.

If the next administration rejects proposals to reform the Veterans Health Administration and instead perpetuates the current system, the effect will be the same.

Providing health care to veterans is a moral imperative and a substantial challenge. The VHA is massive, with roughly 300,000 employees, 20,000 physicians, 1,600 facilities, almost 6 million patients, and a $60 billion annual budget. The system is plagued by deep problems, including a failure to provide the kind of facilities vets need in the places where they’re needed, according to a congressionally mandated independent assessment.

Now, the Commission on Care, formed to figure out how to do better, has recommended the right pathway forward.

One of the most important recommendations is to allow vets to receive care from VHA-credentialed community providers. A 2014 law expanded such access, but it still accounts for a small share of care paid for by the VHA. Vets need to be able to use more convenient, often higher-performing facilities beyond the VHA.

In moving beyond VHA-exclusive care, it’s essential to keep existing programs that are unique to veterans, including those that treat combat-related conditions such as traumatic brain injury, amputation and blindness. But veterans’ health issues are, to a large extent, the same as those of civilians. Most of what the VHA does reflects the fact that half of all veterans are age 65 or older (compared with 17 percent of the civilian population). Health-care services unrelated to military experience can just as well be provided in civilian hospitals and clinics.

What, then, should be done with VHA facilities? This is a broader question, because in general the government could do a better job of managing its physical assets. The VA is no exception. In part because of statutory restrictions, it spends more than $25 million a year to maintain more than 300 buildings that are either vacant or occupied less than half the time. Yet many VHA facilities are on prime real estate. A fast-track process similar to the Defense Department’s successful Base Realignment and Closure system should be used to sell or repurpose VHA facilities that are no longer needed, as the Commission on Care recommends.

Another good idea from the commission is to update the information-technology system.

Both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton agree that veterans should have more access to doctors and hospitals outside the VA system, but they seem to differ in how aggressive they’d be in facilitating such a shift. Despite how much I dislike siding with Mr. Trump on a matter of nuance, sometimes a shove is better than a nudge. This is one example.

 

Peter Orszag was President Barack Obama's director of the Office of Management and Budget. To read more his insights, CLICK HERE NOW.

© Copyright 2017 Bloomberg L.P. All Rights Reserved.

   
1Like our page
2Share
PeterOrszag
Both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton agree that veterans should have more access to doctors and hospitals outside the VA system, but they seem to differ in how aggressive they’d be in facilitating such a shift.
vets, health, care, hospitals
519
2016-25-08
Thursday, 08 Sep 2016 07:25 AM
Newsmax Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
MONEYNEWS.COM
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved