Tags: Reason | Active | Funds | Passive | Investors

Here's the Reason Active Funds Can't Beat Passive Funds

Here's the Reason Active Funds Can't Beat Passive Funds
Iqoncept | Dreamstime.com

By
Thursday, 15 June 2017 12:47 PM Current | Bio | Archive

I’ve touched on the issue of passive investing quite a few times. But this time, I want to show a few charts that illustrate the extent of the problems that are building up in the passive index world.

It is not just ETFs, but also index mutual funds and the enormous amount of pension and insurance funds, along with many trust funds, that are passively invested directly in stocks. They simply duplicate indexes.

Let’s dive in!

Vanguard Owns More Than 5% of 468 Stocks in the S&P 500

First, let’s note that Vanguard now owns more than 5% of 468 stocks in the S&P 500. That’s one fund company.

Source: WSJ

The Reason Active Funds Are Dying out

The number of hedge funds is at its lowest level since 2000. Passive funds are eating away at the assets under management by active funds:

Source: JP Morgan

This trend goes back to a point I made a few weeks ago but that needs to be repeated again and again. When the market obscures distinctions between good stocks and bad stocks because it buys all of them at the same time, there is no way for an active manager to take advantage of his skill in determining value.

That ability to look at a company’s balance sheet and determine something close to true value is what gives active managers their edge. If you don’t have the chance to do this, you cannot add any alpha, and you are going to underperform the simple passive indexes—even though you charge higher fees.

Money will leave you for the seemingly more plentiful pastures of passive indexing. One day you will be vindicated, and the money will come back (think Jeremy Grantham), but because investors will lose a great deal of their money in a bear market, you won’t get as much back in the short term as left you over the past few years.

If you are an active manager, this just sucks. 

The Picture Is Even Gloomier in Retail Funds

The next two charts show the difference between active and passive investing in the retail fund space. It’s a huge contrast:

Source: Morningstar

The chart below traces the widening imbalance since 2008.

Source: Simfund

As I stated above, this imbalance will eventually be corrected. But the correction will not be pretty, though it may be swift.

If I’m going to keep my pledge to be shorter, more thoughtful, and faster, then I’d better close on that note. 

Get a Bird’s-Eye View of the Economy with John Mauldin’s Thoughts from the Frontline

This wildly popular newsletter by celebrated economic commentator, John Mauldin, is a must-read for informed investors who want to go beyond the mainstream media hype and find out about the trends and traps to watch out for. Join hundreds of thousands of fans worldwide, as John uncovers macroeconomic truths in Thoughts from the Frontline. Get it free in your inbox every Monday.

John Mauldin is the chairman of Mauldin Economics, which publishes a growing number of investing resources, including both free and paid publications aimed at helping investors do better in today's challenging economy.

© 2018 Newsmax Finance. All rights reserved.

   
1Like our page
2Share
JohnMauldin
Money will leave you for the seemingly more plentiful pastures of passive indexing.
Reason, Active, Funds, Passive, Investors
525
2017-47-15
Thursday, 15 June 2017 12:47 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
MONEYNEWS.COM
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved