Tags: personal savings | energy | gasoline | cut

Rise in Personal Savings Shows No Energy 'Tax Cut' Is Reaching Consumers

By    |   Wednesday, 03 February 2016 12:23 PM

If China and U.S. manufacturing are suffering from what looks like a slow slide into recession, we don’t have to go very far to find the root cause.

The common denominator is and has been U.S. consumers. That much is evident in the dismal retail sales during the holiday shopping season. The Bureau of Economic Analysis’s update for full personal consumption expenditure figures shows mostly the same (even though overall PCE is highly influenced by “services” spending in the form of imputations and, where evident, services in the form of a tax, or health care).

Real PCE spending was slightly negative in December month-over-month, which suggests another reason why GDP disappointed without too much snow or “residual seasonality.” That makes two of the last three months with essentially zero spending growth despite both what the BEA suggests as somewhat rising income and no “inflation.”

This has been an issue with these data points for some time, as the BEA continually suggests that income is rising faster than spending only to revise income lower in persistent fashion. This dichotomy is highlighted by the personal savings rate, which in count of repeated revisions appears as just noise almost without discernable pattern.
Each time the savings rate moved up erratically (before the current spike) the BEA would eventually counter with a downward revision to income.

Even still, the current trend in income growth remains lackluster by any reasonable standard, which is worse than even that appears in “real” terms since there is little to no calculated “inflation” subtracted in the past year or so. As a result, the savings rate has risen to the highest since 2012 as consumers aren’t following these numbers.

In nominal terms, personal spending growth is as low as it was into the middle of the Great Recession and equivalent to the lowest point in the dot-com recession (just like 2012). The real PCE estimates would suggest that near-zero inflation is a significant difference in favor of the overall economic growth trend but the savings rate and other economic accounts show strongly otherwise.

That is all the more concerning given that the savings rate even on an upward trend here is relatively low to begin with. Consumers have very little room to absorb any negative factors since they are spending (in historic terms) almost all their income just for minor positive numbers overall (for now).

For most of the Great Recession, the savings rate fluctuated between 4 percent and 6 percent; in September 2008, the rate was 4.4 percent, jumping to 5.4 percent in October 2008 and 6.2 percent the month after.

The slope of the savings rate now is much shallower, but the direction remains (if or until there are income revisions again) to a somewhat similar degree. There isn’t much discretion and what little consumers have been able to find (despite “the best jobs market in decades”) they aren’t parting with; and no discernable “tax cut” from the gasoline/oil price collapse, either.

Instead, as far as monetary policy is concerned, December 2015 represented the 44th consecutive month of “inflation” undershooting the 2 percent target for the PCE deflator. At 0.58 percent, it was the highest rate since December 2014 but it won’t last into January with at least the renewed commodity liquidation.

Instead, there is clearly no relationship whatsoever between the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet and the PCE deflator. That might suggest one more reason why the whispers of negative nominal interest rates have only grown since last year rather than perhaps the more expected appeal of a fifth quantitative easing.

Whatever the ultimate case for monetary policy, there is nothing in the spending and income estimates that suggest the economy the FOMC claimed it expected toward “overheating.” Quite the opposite, as “underheating” appears to be widespread and more universal; maybe it’s not that QE was ineffective but monetary policy overall, just in time for increasingly serious economic concerns.

© 2020 Newsmax Finance. All rights reserved.

   
1Like our page
2Share
JeffSnider
If China and U.S. manufacturing are suffering from what looks like a slow slide into recession, we don't have to go very far to find the root cause. The common denominator is and has been U.S. consumers.
personal savings, energy, gasoline, cut
652
2016-23-03
Wednesday, 03 February 2016 12:23 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
MONEYNEWS.COM
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved