Tags: No | Korean | Deal | Kill | Future | US | Trade

No Korean Deal May Kill Future US Trade Pact Prospects

Friday, 12 November 2010 10:44 AM

Before heading to Seoul, U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk was warned by Senator Max Baucus that “no deal is better than a bad deal” when it came to negotiating changes in a free-trade agreement with South Korea.

The announcement by the U.S. and Korean presidents yesterday that they failed to agree on changes to beef and auto provisions may make “no deal” the reality for U.S. trade accords across Asia and the world.

“It’s very disappointing: If they can’t deliver under these circumstances, you have to wonder,” former U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab said in a Bloomberg Radio interview yesterday. “If you can’t re-close a deal when both leaders say they want it done by a certain time, then you have got some serious problems.”

President Barack Obama’s pledge to rework the agreement and submit it to Congress was being watched as a signal of the administration’s ability to get any trade deals approved by lawmakers, William Reinsch, president of the National Foreign Trade Council in Washington, said last week.

“I want to make sure this deal is balanced,” Obama told reporters at the Group of 20 summit in Seoul today. “I want trade agreements that work for the other side, but my main job is to look out for the American people, American workers and American businesses,”

Doubling Exports

With almost $68 billion in trade between the nations, the deal would be the U.S.’s largest since the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994 and would help President Barack Obama meet his goal of doubling American exports in five years. The accord, signed in 2007 by negotiators for President George W. Bush, has languished in Washington as lawmakers complained about Korean barriers to exports of U.S. autos and beef. Ford Motor Co. and the United Auto Workers opposed the agreement and sought changes.

Obama and South Korean President Lee Myung Bak said they will seek to resolve differences in coming weeks.

“I think that we can find a sweet spot that works both for Korea and the United States,” Obama said.

His decision to walk away from a deal in Seoul was praised by critics such as Baucus, a Montana Democrat, Representative Sander Levin, a Michigan Democrat and chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, and Representative Dave Camp, a Michigan Republican who is in line to be the next chairman of that panel. That may make it easier to win approval, if a deal is reached later.

High Stakes

“This is far too important to the bilateral relationship to blow up over these incremental changes,” Jeffrey Schott, a fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington, said in an interview yesterday.

The stakes go well beyond this deal, according to analysts such as Schwab, who spoke on the “Bloomberg on the Economy” program. Schwab signed the Korea agreement as Bush’s trade representative.

Without a Korea deal, other nations “won’t believe the United States has the political will to complete and pass an agreement,” Ernest Bower, director of the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ Southeast Asia Program, wrote in a note yesterday. It’s “the acid test for whether the United States can return to a leadership position on trade.”

Aid For Doha

Progress on the agreements may help kick-start the stalled Doha round of global trade talks at the World Trade Organization, William Toppeta, president of MetLife Inc.’s international business, said yesterday in Seoul.

During Obama’s first two years in office, he didn’t attempt to push through Congress trade pacts approved by Bush with South Korea, Colombia and Panama amid high unemployment and opposition from some fellow Democrats and organized labor.

Trade agreements are becoming unpopular among voters, with 44 percent of Americans saying deals such as Nafta are bad for the U.S., up from 32 percent a year ago, according to a poll released this week by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. Trade with China and South Korea were the least popular among a list of eight U.S. partners, according to the poll of 1,255 adults conducted Nov. 4 to 7.

“Beef was not the only issue that was of concern,” Obama said in Seoul. “We’ve got about 400,000 Korean autos in the United States and a few thousand American cars here in Korea. People are concerned about non-tariff barriers.”

Companies such as Citigroup Inc., United Parcel Service Inc. and Ace Ltd. say an agreement would help open the Korean market to more U.S. exports and foreign investment in financial services.

© Copyright 2019 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.

1Like our page
Before heading to Seoul, U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk was warned by Senator Max Baucus that no deal is better than a bad deal when it came to negotiating changes in a free-trade agreement with South Korea. The announcement by the U.S. and Korean presidents...
Friday, 12 November 2010 10:44 AM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved