×
Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - In Google Play
VIEW
×
Newsmax TV & Webwww.newsmax.comFREE - On the App Store
VIEW
Skip to main content
Tags: Health Topics | vaccines | courts | reinforced

4 Times Courts Have Reinforced Mandatory Vaccinations

By    |   Friday, 12 June 2015 01:32 PM

As California lawmakers face a bill that would require schoolchildren to be vaccinated despite parental beliefs, it is important to understand the law and history behind vaccination mandates. All states require some vaccines of children entering public schools, providing exemptions for medical, religious and sometimes philosophical reasons, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

VOTE NOW: Should Parents Have the Freedom Not to Vaccinate Their Children?

In addition to state laws, court cases challenging these laws help set the framework for what is legal and not in the case of vaccines. Here are 4 times the courts have upheld mandatory vaccination laws.

1. Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905) was a Supreme Court case that originated when Massachusetts mandated Cambridge residents to be vaccinated for smallpox, according to Case Western Reserve Law Review. Reverend Henning Jacobson opposed the vaccine and challenged the Massachusetts law.

The Supreme Court ruled in the state’s favor, holding that public health and safety is part of a state’s policy power and “legislation was a valid exercise of the state’s police power and not an invasion of any constitutional rights,” Case Western Reserve said.

2. Zucht v. King (1922) centered on a Texas state law that required schoolchildren to have been vaccinated. The Supreme Court also upheld the state law stating that “municipal officers had ‘broad discretion in matters affecting the application and enforcement of a health law,’” according to Case Western.

URGENT: Should the Government Be Allowed to Mandate Vaccinations?

3. In re Christine M. (1992) was a New York Family Court case that ruled a father medical neglect when he refused to give his 4-year-old daughter the measles vaccine in the middle of a community measles epidemic, Case Western said. The father had claimed religious exemptions, but the court ruled that since his church did not forbid vaccinations, it was not sufficient for exemption.

4. Boone v. Boozman (2002) was a District Court case regarding Hepatitis B vaccination. A mother argued that there was no presence of a current epidemic and she had a religious opposition to vaccinating her 4-year-old daughter, Case Western reported. The law review explains that the court ruled against the mother since hepatitis B has serious side effects (being the second leading cause of cancer), and those at high risk (young adults) are unlikely to self-identify and get the vaccine.

There are numerous court cases and precedents surrounding this issue. Vaccination law will continue to change as lawmakers and the judiciary face these issues.

VOTE NOW: Should Vaccinations for Children Be the Parents' Decision?

Related Stories:

© 2021 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


FastFeatures
As California lawmakers face a bill that would require schoolchildren to be vaccinated despite parental beliefs, it is important to understand the law and history behind vaccination mandates.
vaccines, courts, reinforced
442
2015-32-12
Friday, 12 June 2015 01:32 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

PLEASE NOTE: All information presented on Newsmax.com is for informational purposes only. It is not specific medical advice for any individual. All answers to reader questions are provided for informational purposes only. All information presented on our websites should not be construed as medical consultation or instruction. You should take no action solely on the basis of this publication’s contents. Readers are advised to consult a health professional about any issue regarding their health and well-being. While the information found on our websites is believed to be sensible and accurate based on the author’s best judgment, readers who fail to seek counsel from appropriate health professionals assume risk of any potential ill effects. The opinions expressed in Newsmaxhealth.com and Newsmax.com do not necessarily reflect those of Newsmax Media. Please note that this advice is generic and not specific to any individual. You should consult with your doctor before undertaking any medical or nutritional course of action.

 
TOP

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the NewsmaxTV App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved