Tags: Abortion | Religion | bigotry | birth | control | catholic | eugenics

Intolerant Sanger Still Defended

Intolerant Sanger Still Defended


By Thursday, 27 August 2020 10:42 AM Current | Bio | Archive

Some who have taken a look at the writings and speeches of Margaret Sanger contend that she was a racist.

Is the evidence there? There are those who are still trying to rescue her legacy.

Worse, there are some who are in total denial.

On July 21, Planned Parenthood of Greater New York announced it would remove Sanger's name from its Manhattan clinic. It cited her "harmful connections to the eugenics movement," as if that were breaking news; it has been known for a century.

But it stopped short of calling her out for her racist agenda.

It is impossible to separate eugenics from racism: it was built on it.

Angela Franks, who authored "Margaret Sanger's Eugenics Legacy," said "she believed that if you eliminated the poor, then there would be no more poverty. Instead of eliminating the problem, she would eliminate the people who had the problem."

That was the purpose of Sangers'birth control crusade.

Today, almost 8 in 10 Planned Parenthood abortion clinics are in minority neighborhoods.

Sanger opened her first birth control clinic in Brooklyn in 1916. After officials at the abortion giant recently admitted that her record was tainted, they adjusted the section on their website titled, "100 Years Strong." In their concluding statement on "Margaret Sanger — Our Founder," they said, "Like all leaders — Sanger had many flaws."

In other words, Sanger's clinics adversely impacting African Americans was merely a "flaw."

This is the best Planned Parenthood can admit to today. 

Sanger's friends in Marxist circles continue to defend her.

"People's World," which could be viewed as the successor to the "Daily Worker," published a piece on Aug. 6 saying, "While Sanger did have ideas we find intolerable today, bigotry and contempt for workers were not among them." (emphasis in italics mine)

Distorting Sanger's past is commonplace.

Ellen Chesler wrote the most celebrated volume on Sanger, "Women of Valor."

After carefully documenting all of Sanger's work that served racist causes, she concludes that while her subject was "rabidly anti-Catholic," she was not a racist.

This is what happens when feminist ideology clouds the mind.

It affects the ability to reason.

Edwin Black authored an influential book about Sanger's contribution to the eugenics movement, "War Against the Weak." He admitted that "Sanger surrounded herself with some of the eugenics movement's most outspoken racists and white supremacists."

He also wrote that "she openly welcomed" racists and anti-Semites into "the birth control movement." Yet, like Chesler, he concludes that she "was not a racist."

The most recent defender of Sanger's racist history is Katha Pollitt, an abortion rights  extremist who writes for the Nation. "For the record," she says, "Margaret Sanger was not a racist." Why not? Because prominent blacks supported her. The "exoneration by association" gambit fails: They may have supported her birth control policies, but they certainly did not support abortion. As late as 1963, Planned Parenthood admitted that "An abortion kills the life of the baby after it has begun."

It does not help Pollitt's case to cite H.G. Wells' support for Sanger (Planned Parenthood also notes that he was her ally). He made clear his goal. "We want fewer and better children . . . and we cannot make the social life and the world-peace we are determined to make, with the ill-bred, ill-trained swarms of inferior citizens that you inflict upon us."

In case Pollitt doubts who Wells was referring to, consider what Sanger said in her book, "Women, Morality, and Birth Control." "We don't want the word to get out that we want to exterminate the Negro population." Moreover, Sanger constantly called those in the lower class "weeds" and "human waste" who must be "exterminated."

While Sanger did not campaign to make abortion legal, it is intellectually dishonest to say she was viscerally opposed to abortion. Indeed, she supported infanticide. "The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."

Her honesty was commendable, even if her goal was evil.

Two months ago, 300 of its staffers signed a letter condemning the organization's "climate of systemic racism." That is an understatement. The workers were only referring to conditions in the workplace — they were not referring to the racist outcomes of their work.

Dr. William Donohue is the president and CEO of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights. The publisher of the Catholic League journal, Catalyst, Donohue is a former Bradley Resident Scholar at the Heritage Foundation and served for two decades on the board of directors of the National Association of Scholars. He is the author of eight books, and the winner of several teaching awards and many awards from the Catholic community. Read Bill Donohue's Reports — More Here.

© 2021 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Some who have taken a look at the writings and speeches of Margaret Sanger contend that she was a racist. Is the evidence there? There are those who are still trying to rescue her legacy. Worse, there are some who are in total denial.
bigotry, birth, control, catholic, eugenics
Thursday, 27 August 2020 10:42 AM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved