Tags: Health Topics | Cancer | e-cigarettes | FDA | smoking

Smokescreens on E-Cigs Block Safer Alternatives

Image: Smokescreens on E-Cigs Block Safer Alternatives
(George Mdivanian/Dreamstime)

By
Tuesday, 06 Jun 2017 12:12 PM Current | Bio | Archive

Hypocrisy has reached new heights, even by Washington, D.C. standards. The same left-wing Senators who support needle exchange and methadone programs to reduce the harm to drug addicts and demand condoms for higher schoolers to have safe sex are waging war against the most effective harm reducer of all — e-cigarettes.

Sens. Al Franken, D-Minn., Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., Patty Murray, D-Wash., and other Democrats are demanding new FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb crack down on e-cigarettes without delay. Across the aisle, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., is urging Gottlieb to examine the compelling evidence that vaping saves lives by helping smokers quit the deadly habit.

Some 480,000 people in our country die each year from smoking. But quitting is hard. E-cigarettes are far more effective than any patch, coach, or gum at weaning addicts off their cancer sticks. And they’re diverting teens from even starting smoking.

But facts be damned. Senate Democrats are politicizing the issue, claiming that "special interestslie behind the FDA’s decision to delay pending regulations drafted by the Obama administration.

The new regs, originally scheduled to go into effect already, would compel all e-cigarette devices and flavors to be pre-approved by the FDA before being sold. The cost of pre-approval would crush all but the biggest producers. The Trump administration wisely put these rules on hold to look at the facts. Johnson says the FDA should junk the regs altogether.

The FDA should be facilitating, not impeding, the use of e-cigarettes. New research from the UK shows over half of e-cigarette users in that country have quit smoking entirely. England’s most prestigious medical group, the Royal College of Physicians, endorses "large-scale substitution of e-cigarettes" for smoking. The country’s National Health Service urges patients who smoke to switch to vaping.

In Europe, 6 million ex-smokers report that e-cigarettes helped them quit, according to EU data. Yielding impressive improvements in health. Smokers with hypertension who switch to vaping show significant decreases in systolic blood pressure after 12 months, better results than with medications.

Asthmatics who switch from smoking to vaping gain better lung function and relief from coughing, reports Riccardo Polosa, Director of the Institute of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology in Italy.

What about teens? Vaping is not a gateway to smoking in adults or teens, contrary to what the Democratic senators claim.

But they prefer fearmongering to facts, accusing manufacturers of predatory marketing like luring adolescents with candy-like flavors.

In fact, vaping appears to be responsible for the dramatic drop in teen smoking since 2010, down more than 50 percent. Teens are vaping instead of smoking.

Would it be better if they did neither? Yes, but human beings have been sticking things in their mouth since the beginning of time. Vaping is harm reduction.

That’s not the same as harmless. There may be traces of toxins, metals and carcinogens in vapor. But vaping is 95 percent less harmful than smoking cigarettes, researchers conclude.

The more smokers switch to vaping, the more lives will be saved.

As for second hand smoke, it contains 60 carcinogens and is far more dangerous than the low levels of toxins in second hand vapor.

New scientific evidence drawn from four countries – the U.S., Canada, Australia, and England — shows the more restrictive a country’s vaping regulations, the less likely smokers are to put out their cigarettes and take up vaping. The FDA should heed this life-and-death information.

Both the European Union and the UK have set quality and safety standards for e-cigarettes without imposing a costly pre-approval regimen. The U.S. should do the same.

Millions of lives are at stake over how the U.S. regulates e-cigarettes. Sadly, the left is making it tougher for smokers and teens prone to smoking to choose the harm-reducing alternative. Liberals have long mocked the "just say no" approach, but that’s what they’re telling smokers. Harm reduction is okay for heroin addicts but not cigarette addicts.

Betsy McCaughey is a patient advocate, and is chairman of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths. She is also a constitutional scholar, syndicated columnist, regular contributor on Fox News and CNBC, and former lieutenant governor of New York. In 1993 she read the 1,362-page Clinton health bill, warned the nation of what it said, and made history. McCaughey earned her Ph.D. in constitutional history from Columbia University. She is author of "Beating Obamacare 2014" and "Government by Choice: Inventing the United States Constitution." For more of Betsy's reports, Go Here Now.

© 2017 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

   
1Like our page
2Share
McCaughey
Millions of lives are at stake over e-cigarette regulation. The left makes it tougher for smokers to choose harm-reducing alternatives. Liberals have long mocked the “just say no” approach, but that’s what they’re telling smokers. Harm reduction is okay for heroin addicts but not cigarette addicts.
e-cigarettes, FDA, smoking
749
2017-12-06
Tuesday, 06 Jun 2017 12:12 PM
Newsmax Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved