Tags: hillary clinton | fbi | email | constitution

Hillary's Election Would Create a Constitutional Crisis

Hillary's Election Would Create a Constitutional Crisis

Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks during a campaign rally at Dickerson Community Center on October 29, 2016 in Daytona Beach, Florida. With less than two weeks to go until Election Day, Hillary Clinton is campaigning in Florida. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

By
Monday, 31 October 2016 10:58 AM Current | Bio | Archive

Politicians can say what they like but the fact that FBI Director James Comey was a key prosecutor in the Clinton Whitewater Scandal should have required that he recuse himself from any investigation into Clinton’s email server. The fact that Attorney General Loretta Lynch and President Barack Obama failed to call for an independent investigation of such by a special prosecutor points to an internal cancer allowing for two separate systems of justice, one for those elected to power and protected with an insider’s shield, the other for us poor peons who are denied access to so much on one candidate who seems to have snookered the public but could possibly be elected president of the USA.

The alleged funneling of money through the US State Department during Hillary Clinton’s tenure to the Clinton Foundation is fraught with so many conflicts of interest and seemingly is a pay-to-play scheme. This nation should be embarrassed to have let it continue, especially with the unforgivable exploitation of the tragedies in Haiti.

The fact that Russia was able to buy through that organization 20 percent of the nation’s uranium for very little on the dollar raises the specter of a serious national security breach — we may have to go to them to get our own fuel for our power plants and warheads.

Come on now, don’t folks understand the gravity of this?

The leaked WikiLeaks transcripts regarding damaging data on the Clintons is disturbing, for access to the State Department-related information in and of itself seems to rise to that level of security violations which should be punishable by law. If my reading between the lines in that data is correct, we have only seen the tip of the iceberg which seems to peak into the levels of the White House with questions for President Obama — when and what did he know about this and when did it become known?

Could all the campaigning for a woman who previously maligned his character be an attempt to preserve his legacy, whatever folks may consider such to be?

Why has no cease-and-desist order been given to the Clinton Foundation, which continues to accept foreign dollars, employ Chelsea Clinton in an executive position paying $600,000, and has required no public accounting of its operations, donors, nor copies of her speeches — which say one thing in private and another in public. If elected will Clinton and her family ties continue to this organization?

WikiLeaks reported that Billionaire Democratic patron George Soros has ties to the British company Semantics which provides voting machines, many of which are paperless. Could such allow elections to be rigged? Why would any nation turn to foreign entities to do essential functions for their government?

Does the Soros Open Society Foundation promote a borderless world, a right for refugees to immigrate openly, or a world court system similar to that of the United Nations which could threaten a nation’s sovereignty? Are the paranoid fears of those concerned by the threat of a New World Order closer than is appreciated?

If the investigation into possible improprieties during the Hillary Clinton tenure as U.S. Secretary of State doesn’t continue, regardless of its proximity to the elections, how can it be justified, for there is no time limit for crimes against the USA?

If that rationale is allowed should the previous allegations against Trump have been disallowed?

More importantly, will the president grant a pardon to Clinton for all crimes committed while Secretary of State or, G-d forbid, were she to become president, it is possible that she could grant herself a pardon? Remember what happened when Gerald R. Ford pardoned Richard M. Nixon. This law as well as the abuses in the use of executive orders all threatened the "We the People..." Constitutional underpinnings of this nation.

Dr. Ada M. Fisher was the first black woman to serve as the Republican National Committeewoman. She was a candidate for the U.S. Senate from North Carolina, a candidate for U.S. Congress, and a candidate for the North Carolina House of Representatives. She is the author of "Common Sense Conservative Prescriptions Solutions for What Ails Us, Book I." For more of her reports, Go Here Now.

© 2019 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

   
1Like our page
2Share
AdaFisher
Politicians can say what they like but the fact that FBI Director James Comey was a key prosecutor in the Clinton Whitewater Scandal should have required that he recuse himself from any investigation into Clinton’s email server.
hillary clinton, fbi, email, constitution
699
2016-58-31
Monday, 31 October 2016 10:58 AM
Newsmax Media, Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved