Skip to main content
Tags: ge | immelt
OPINION

Immelt Discovers Govt Is No Private Sector Ally

Immelt Discovers Govt Is No Private Sector Ally
General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt speaks during a groundbreaking ceremony at the site of GE's new headquarters as Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker, left, looks on, Monday, May 8, 2017, in Boston. (Michael Dwyer/AP)

Ira Stoll By Monday, 12 June 2017 03:31 PM EDT Current | Bio | Archive

Monday’s (June 12, 2017) announcement that  General Electric (GE) is replacing its chief executive officer and chairman, Jeff Immelt, brought me back to a little-noticed moment at the end of the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation’s dinner last month honoring President Obama with its Profile in Courage award.

Following President Obama’s speech, the chairman of the foundation, superlawyer Kenneth Feinberg, concluded the program with these words, "Ladies and Gentlemen, I thank President Obama for those comments. I thank the ambassador, Caroline Kennedy, for her efforts in helping us prepare and implement this great evening today. And I particularly thank Jeff Immelt, and General Electric, for their leadership in providing this, this evening."

Quite an achievement for a corporate executive, Immelt, in a crowd that included not only Obama and a raft of Kennedys but also Joe Biden and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., to get the final, emphatic thank you.

How many other people are there who not only socialize with Kennedys and Obama, but also, simultaneously, serve as an adviser to President Trump?

Immelt played golf with Trump and has visited him at the White House. The executive claims credit (or blame, depending on how you see it) for having talked Trump into starring in the "Apprentice" television show back when GE owned NBC. The role helped eventually propel Trump to the presidency.

GE has a long and sometimes even glorious tradition of involvement in American politics that dates back well before Immelt took over the company. This struck me first when I had the chance to visit President Reagan’s ranch in the hills above Santa Barbara, Calif.

The house itself is modest, with the exception of the kitchen, which is furnished with top-of-the-line GE appliances, a dividend of Reagan’s years from 1954 to 1962 as a General Electric spokesperson. Thomas W. Evans elaborates that story in his book "The Education of Ronald Reagan: The General Electric Years and the Untold Story of His Conversion to Conservatism."

GE’s corporate politics have shifted leftward in the years since Reagan, as evidenced by Immelt’s tweet lambasting Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement.

The company’s active involvement in public affairs can cut both ways. At best, as in GE’s relationship with Reagan, politically involved companies can help educate politicians about the benefits of capitalism and the barriers created by taxes and regulations. At worst, the relationships can degenerate into cronyism, as politically connected companies, like GE during the financial crisis, benefit from taxpayer-funded rescues, lucrative government contracts, or regulations like GE’s government mandate that consumers purchase its lousy but expensive compact-fluorescent light bulbs.

GE stock rose on the news of the impending departure of Immelt, who is 61, and his replacement with another GE executive, John Flannery, who is 55.

Modest gains may continue if GE keeps working government to its advantage. Flannery heads GE’s health care division, which is heavily government-financed either directly or indirectly.

To really reach Apple, Google, Amazon, or Facebook-level growth, though, GE would have to reach back to the legacy of its co-founder, Thomas Edison, and invent something new or better, like an electric light bulb. Once the invention is made, companies like GE are good for winning political agreements to help get products widely adopted.

Without the invention, the firm is just a high-powered lobbying operation. Not that Washington lobbyists don’t make lots of money, but if that’s the route GE really wanted to take, when it recently moved its headquarters out of Connecticut, it should have chosen to head for Washington, D.C. not Boston.

Boston, with its colleges and universities and medical schools and hospitals, represented a bet for GE on innovation and ingenuity — not big government. All of Immelt’s ties to Obama, Trump, and the Kennedys ultimately weren’t enough to keep him in his CEO job.

Let it be a cautionary lesson for any corporate leader who hopes the route to profits runs through Washington.

Ira Stoll is editor of FutureOfCapitalism.com and author of "JFK, Conservative." Read more reports from Ira Stoll — Click Here Now.

© 2024 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Ira-Stoll
Boston represented a bet for GE on innovation and ingenuity, not big government. All of Immelt’s ties to Obama, Trump, and the Kennedys ultimately weren’t enough to keep him in his CEO job. Let it be a cautionary lesson for any corporate leader who hopes the route to profits runs through Washington.
ge, immelt
673
2017-31-12
Monday, 12 June 2017 03:31 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.
Join the Newsmax Community
Read and Post Comments
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
 
TOP

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the Newsmax App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved