Skip to main content
Tags: un | guns | treaty | obama | nra | reacted

UN Guns Treaty: How the NRA Reacted When Obama Signed Arms Accord

By    |   Thursday, 22 January 2015 07:50 PM EST

In April 2013 the United Nations general assembly approved a new arms treaty, the Arms Trade Treaty, by a vote of 154-3. Three nations opposed the treaty — Iran, Syria, and North Korea — and it stirred up strife among many conservatives in America, who say the U.N. guns treaty is a violation of Second Amendment rights.

The National Rifle Association is staunchly opposed to the U.N. guns treaty. When United States Secretary of State John Kerry signed the treaty on behalf of the Obama administration, the NRA said the treaty was a demonstration of the administration’s contempt for the Second Amendment.

URGENT: Do You Support Obama's Plans for Stricter Gun Control? Vote Now

“The Obama administration is once again demonstrating its contempt for our fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms,” said Chris W. Cox, the executive director of the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action.

The U.N. guns treaty went into effect in America as of Dec. 24, 2014; however, it must be ratified by a two-thirds majority of the Senate before it becomes law. According to TheBlaze, the treaty stands “very little chance of being ratified.”

Catherine Mortenson, spokesperson for the NRA, told TheBlaze, “We are worried about an end-run around Congress. Barack Obama or a future anti-gun president could use ATT and international norms compliance to rationalize enacting gun control policies through executive actions, especially in the import and export realms.

“Even now, with an existing appropriations rider prohibiting action to implement the treaty unless it is approved by Congress, administration officials are publicly professing support for international efforts to bring the treaty into effect. That’s outrageous,” Mortenson said.

VOTE NOW: Do You Support a Ban on All Fully Automatic Rifles?

According to the NRA-ILA article, a bipartisan group of senators already oppose the treaty and have introduced legislation that will prevent America from approving the treaty.

The article stated that, “On March 23, the Senate adopted an amendment to its FY 2014 Budget Resolution, offered by Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), that establishes a deficit-neutral fund for ‘the purpose of preventing the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.’ This amendment is in addition to the previous efforts of Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) and Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) to pass concurrent resolutions opposing the treaty in their respective chambers.”

Cox called the UN guns treaty is a “blatant attack” on Second Amendment freedoms in the NRA-ILA article, and said the NRA continue to fight “assaults” on fundamental freedoms.

This article does not constitute legal advice. Check the current gun laws before purchasing or traveling with a firearm.

ALERT: Should Obama Have More Control Over Guns? Vote Now

Related Stories:

© 2024 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


FastFeatures
In April 2013 the United Nations general assembly approved the Arms Trade Treaty by a vote of 154-3. Three nations opposed the treaty — Iran, Syria, and North Korea — and it stirred up strife among many conservatives in America, who say the U.N. guns treaty is a violation of the Second Amendment.
un, guns, treaty, obama, nra, reacted
469
2015-50-22
Thursday, 22 January 2015 07:50 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.

PLEASE NOTE: All information presented on Newsmax.com is for informational purposes only. It is not specific medical advice for any individual. All answers to reader questions are provided for informational purposes only. All information presented on our websites should not be construed as medical consultation or instruction. You should take no action solely on the basis of this publication’s contents. Readers are advised to consult a health professional about any issue regarding their health and well-being. While the information found on our websites is believed to be sensible and accurate based on the author’s best judgment, readers who fail to seek counsel from appropriate health professionals assume risk of any potential ill effects. The opinions expressed in Newsmaxhealth.com and Newsmax.com do not necessarily reflect those of Newsmax Media. Please note that this advice is generic and not specific to any individual. You should consult with your doctor before undertaking any medical or nutritional course of action.

 
TOP

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the NewsmaxTV App
Get the NewsmaxTV App for iOS Get the NewsmaxTV App for Android Scan QR code to get the NewsmaxTV App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved