Skip to main content
Tags: payout | lawsuit | police misconduct | arizona

Largest Payouts for Police Misconduct Lawsuits in Arizona

By    |   Tuesday, 11 August 2015 01:40 PM EDT

The courts are still considering what could be the largest payout in a lawsuit over alleged police misconduct in Arizona that could add millions more to the millions that Arizona taxpayers, specifically Maricopa County residents, have already spent on lawsuits stemming from police misconduct.

In February 2013, the Board of Supervisors in Maricopa County, Arizona, approved a $550,000 settlement for the family of an Arizona inmate who had been shot with a stun gun and left unattended in a "safe cell," and then later died after being declared brain dead at a local hospital, The Arizona Republic reported.

Urgent: Should All Police Officers Have to Wear Body Cameras?

The board voted unanimously 4-0 to approve the settlement for the family of Ernest "Marty" Atencio, saying they did not want the case to linger and move on to a lengthy trial. He died in 2011, five days after an altercation with jail officers and members of the Phoenix police department that occurred as he was being booked.

The family refused the settlement, and in its lawsuit against the county, described Atencio's treatment as a "jailer's riot," the Republic said. He had been hit repeatedly and a stun gun hit close to his heart, the lawsuit noted.

Atencio had been arrested for assault after allegedly screaming at a woman in a Phoenix parking lot.

The lawsuit contended that jail workers did not pay attention to mental issues in Atencio, who was 44 when he died. Police records supported the family's contentions, noting that he "would become distracted and attempt to chase cars while talking to officers," the paper said.

Vote Now: Does Media Coverage Make Police Officers' Jobs More Dangerous?

According to the lawsuit, jail workers denied Atencio the medical treatment he needed, sending him through the booking process where officers allegedly made fun of Atencio’s mental state before becoming physically engaged with him.

An autopsy by the Maricopa County Medical Examiner's office did not include a manner of death — whether homicide or natural causes — the paper said, but noted that Atencio died of "cardiac arrest, acute psychosis, medical problems, and “law-enforcement subdual."

The absence of a manner of death, such as homicide or natural causes, in the report was notable, attorney Michael Manning said.

The family had previously offered to settle the case for $20 million.

Manning told The Huffington Post that Atencio was a Gulf War veteran who had schizoaffective disorder.

"When he went into that facility everyone knew he was mentally ill," Manning, told the Post. "He wasn't resistant, violent, or combative and they mocked him, they made fun of him, and when they finished with that, they decided they would just beat him up."

The Goldwater Institute found that Maricopa County had paid out
at least $30 million in “Sheriff Department General Liability claims” in years prior to the Atencio case.

Tell Us: Does Racism Play a Role in Police Officers' Actions?

Related Stories:

© 2024 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


FastFeatures
The courts are still considering what could be the largest payout in a lawsuit over alleged police misconduct in Arizona that could add millions more to the millions that Arizona taxpayers, specifically Maricopa County residents, have already spent on lawsuits stemming from police misconduct.
payout, lawsuit, police misconduct, arizona
502
2015-40-11
Tuesday, 11 August 2015 01:40 PM
Newsmax Media, Inc.

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis - sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)
Privacy: We never share your email address.

PLEASE NOTE: All information presented on Newsmax.com is for informational purposes only. It is not specific medical advice for any individual. All answers to reader questions are provided for informational purposes only. All information presented on our websites should not be construed as medical consultation or instruction. You should take no action solely on the basis of this publication’s contents. Readers are advised to consult a health professional about any issue regarding their health and well-being. While the information found on our websites is believed to be sensible and accurate based on the author’s best judgment, readers who fail to seek counsel from appropriate health professionals assume risk of any potential ill effects. The opinions expressed in Newsmaxhealth.com and Newsmax.com do not necessarily reflect those of Newsmax Media. Please note that this advice is generic and not specific to any individual. You should consult with your doctor before undertaking any medical or nutritional course of action.

 
TOP

Interest-Based Advertising | Do not sell or share my personal information

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Download the NewsmaxTV App
Get the NewsmaxTV App for iOS Get the NewsmaxTV App for Android Scan QR code to get the NewsmaxTV App
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved