Tags: royals | hot dog | trial | kansas city royals

Royals Hot Dog Trial: Mo. Supreme Court Grants Injured Fan New Hearing

By    |   Wednesday, 25 Jun 2014 08:20 AM

The Kansas City Royals fan who claims he was injured when a mascot tossed a hot dog at his face will get a new trial, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.

The state's highest court said in a unanimous ruling that a legal standard called the baseball rule, which protects teams from being sued over fan injuries caused by events on the field, court, or rink, didn't apply to a mascot throwing hot dogs to fans in the stands.

According to The Associated Press, the state Supreme Court said the risk of being injured by a tossed hot dog is not an inherent risk of watching a baseball game.

Urgent: Do You Approve Or Disapprove of President Obama's Job Performance? Vote Now in Urgent Poll

"That risk is no more inherent in watching a game of baseball than it is inherent in watching a rock concert, a monster truck rally, or any other assemblage where free food or T-shirts are tossed into the crowd to increase excitement and boost attendance," the court said in its 36-page ruling.

John Coomer of Overland Park, Kansas, said he was injured at a 2009 Royals game when the team's mascot, Sluggerrr, threw a wrapped hot dog into the stands, striking Coomer in the eye. Coomer had two surgeries, including one to repair a detached retina. He was seeking compensation in excess of $20,000 from the team.

The Missouri Supreme Court ruling said a jury that first heard the case and sided with the Royals were improperly instructed to consider whether the risk of the injury from the mascot was an inherent risk of watching the game.

"No such argument applies to Sluggerrr's hot dog toss," the ruling said. "Millions of fans have watched the Royals (and its forebears in professional baseball) play the National Pastime for the better part of a century before Sluggerrr began tossing hotdogs, and millions more people watch professional baseball every year in stadiums all across the country without the benefit of such antics."

However, Royals attorney Scott Hoffer said another jury may still rule for the Royals. Hofer noted that the jury at the first trial found Coomer was at fault because he wasn't aware of what was going on around him.

"Notably, the Supreme Court did not say the jury was wrong when it assigned Mr. Coomer 100% of the fault," Hofer said. "We don't see how what the Supreme Court did will affect how a jury views this case."

Bob Tormohlen, who represented Coomer, said he was pleased with the ruling.

"It's always good to win," Tormohlen said. He said he hadn't yet discussed the decision with Coomer.

Randy Maniloff, a Philadelphia lawyer who often writes about cases involving sporting event spectators, said he was surprised by the decision. He said the ruling could force sports teams to rethink how mascots in the stands interact with spectators.

"The mascots have a lot of interactions with fans, and now the question becomes: Will the teams have to take a step back and look at what their mascots are doing, and are they going to change their activities?" he said.

Urgent: Assess Your Heart Attack Risk in Minutes. Click Here.

© 2017 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

 
1Like our page
2Share
TheWire
The Kansas City Royals fan who claims he was injured when a mascot tossed a hot dog at his face will get a new trial, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.
royals, hot dog, trial, kansas city royals
531
2014-20-25
Wednesday, 25 Jun 2014 08:20 AM
Newsmax Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved